From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11378: 24.1.50; Suggestion: Let M-i in isearch cycle `search-invisible' Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:22:50 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87ip5tdikt.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <87haw32hly.fsf@web.de> <87397m6oxf.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87y5pcdzxx.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <874nqzgcuk.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87vcjesccy.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87lijtcx8m.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360921298 16464 80.91.229.3 (15 Feb 2013 09:41:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:41:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11378@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 15 10:41:59 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U6Hnl-0003ds-Cb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:41:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44532 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6HnR-0000y2-N1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:41:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6HnJ-0000xu-SY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:41:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6HnF-0005y5-DF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:41:25 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51646) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6HnF-0005xw-AH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:41:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U6Hnu-0001Xr-69 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:42:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11378 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11378-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11378.13609213205930 (code B ref 11378); Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11378) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2013 09:42:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57110 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U6Hns-0001Xb-0R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:42:00 -0500 Original-Received: from ps18281.dreamhost.com ([69.163.218.105]:56405 helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U6Hno-0001XO-8k for 11378@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:41:57 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD63C201B3332D; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 01:41:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87lijtcx8m.fsf@mail.jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Tue, 12 Jun 2012 02:44:17 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:71302 Archived-At: > There is one remaining question: > do we still need a filter for visible text? I tend to conclude that a filter for visible text is not needed, because to handle the value of `search-invisible' correctly this filter should reside in `isearch-filter-predicates' permanently that makes little sense. This assumes that the variable `search-invisible' is not going to be marked obsolete in favor of filters. Only in this case filters would make sense that will require two separate filters: one to just skip hidden text (implementing the current value `nil' of `search-invisible'), another filter to open hidden overlays (implementing the value `open' of `search-invisible'), and no filter means the value `t' of `search-invisible'. Otherwise, searching in hidden text should handle the variable `search-invisible' without using filters.