From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8764: 24.0.50; cedet/semantic/bovine/c-by.el:184:1:Error: Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth' Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 15:48:37 -0800 Message-ID: <87iosv21wq.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <87ipssktyz.fsf@cbbrowne.afilias-int.info> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391471410 7870 80.91.229.3 (3 Feb 2014 23:50:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 23:50:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8764@debbugs.gnu.org, Christopher Browne To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 04 00:50:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WATHM-000550-4i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:50:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50096 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WATHL-0004Hl-Qw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:50:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38963) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WATHD-0004Fc-VI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:50:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WATH8-0000hs-LG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:50:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34439) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WATH8-0000hd-Hj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WATH8-0002w9-0X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 23:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8764 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 8764-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8764.139147139311255 (code B ref 8764); Mon, 03 Feb 2014 23:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8764) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2014 23:49:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48455 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WATGy-0002vQ-PR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:49:52 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:35923) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WATGx-0002vJ-7k for 8764@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:49:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WATGh-0001VY-F7; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:49:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 30 May 2011 19:15:59 -0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WATGh-0001VY-F7 MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392076177.07871@alYV+ZLOAQQ7c4j0YXT0EQ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84523 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> That isn't quite a scientific evaluation of what ought to be >> necessary, but it sure seems that the value can need to be higher than >> 1200, and it's pretty plausible that 1635 only helps until an extra >> couple elements get added to the parser, increasing stack usage. > > Since 1200 seems sufficient during bootstrap, it would be worthwhile to > try and figure out what is different between your case and the > bootstrap case. More information was requested two years ago, but no further progress has been made (and this seems to work for everybody else), so I'm closing this bug report. If this problem is still present, please reopen the bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/