From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11126: 24.0.94; `customize-apropos' does not seem to work for a list of words Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 20:58:47 -0800 Message-ID: <87iosodgqg.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <53DDC16715F040F9BB07011518AF3C13@us.oracle.com> <11B0BD1B3B6F420EA7DFB67D4D581D9F@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391922069 11320 80.91.229.3 (9 Feb 2014 05:01:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 05:01:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11126@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 09 06:01:15 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WCMW2-00050v-RU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 06:01:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49235 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCMW2-0005un-HI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 00:01:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40167) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCMVv-0005uX-R3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 00:01:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCMVq-0005z5-Qu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 00:01:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44859) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCMVq-0005z1-Nt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 00:01:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCMVq-0005g5-HB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 00:01:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 05:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11126 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11126-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11126.139192201718630 (code B ref 11126); Sun, 09 Feb 2014 05:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11126) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2014 05:00:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58875 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCMV6-0004pU-Ga for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 00:00:16 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:54000) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCMV4-0004mr-Hn for 11126@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 00:00:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WCMUp-0005d6-0j; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 05:59:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <11B0BD1B3B6F420EA7DFB67D4D581D9F@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:25:05 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WCMUp-0005d6-0j MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392526800.65471@hl/Nsuq6P9j/hxbKxcuFWA X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85050 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > Is the behavior is intentional? In that case it is the doc that is wrong > (misleading, to put it mildly). > > "If it is a list of words, search for matches for any two (or more) of those > words." > > Matches against what? Against the set of names of customize things? Or against > only a single such name? Against the set of names of customizable things. I think that's pretty obvious from the context. Closing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/