From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17215: Acknowledgement (Build failure) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 17:51:19 +0200 Message-ID: <87ioqfdfuw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <871tx9k1dy.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1397231744 7975 80.91.229.3 (11 Apr 2014 15:55:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 15:55:44 +0000 (UTC) To: 17215@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 11 17:55:37 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WYdnj-0002hw-Ey for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 17:55:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58536 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WYdnj-0007IY-4v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:55:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48049) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WYdkJ-0001zm-TF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:52:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WYdkJ-00085t-8H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:52:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37403) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WYdkJ-00085k-1R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:52:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WYdkI-0003Vl-BS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:52:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: David Kastrup Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 15:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17215 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 17215-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17215.139723148813407 (code B ref 17215); Fri, 11 Apr 2014 15:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17215) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2014 15:51:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45560 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WYdjj-0003UB-P7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:51:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:54923 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WYdjc-0003Th-TK for 17215@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:51:26 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33997 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WYdjc-0001Yu-85 for 17215@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:51:20 -0400 Original-Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C0EFAE0531; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 17:51:19 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (GNU bug Tracking System's message of "Mon, 07 Apr 2014 08:09:03 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:87948 Archived-At: It would appear that this particular bug yielded to the pure size increase. What a singularly useless error behavior for a problem that is expected to reoccur with some regularity! So I think this bug can be closed. It would not seem to be related to the more obscure GC problems that were suggested as its cause at first. Bit of a pity since it was quite reproducible. -- David Kastrup