From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Richard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18013: 24.3.92; Infloop in re_search_2 Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:15:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87ion09rgh.fsf@geodiff-mac3.ulb.ac.be> References: <87oaws9sp2.fsf@geodiff-mac3.ulb.ac.be> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1405332865 15975 80.91.229.3 (14 Jul 2014 10:14:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:14:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Nicolas Richard , 18013@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 14 12:14:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X6dH0-0002tA-0M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:14:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55693 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6dGz-00082f-3Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 06:14:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55749) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6dGq-00080x-IP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 06:14:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6dGk-0006g0-Uo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 06:14:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58947) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6dGk-0006fr-SA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 06:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X6dGk-0004M7-5Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 06:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Nicolas Richard Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18013 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18013-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18013.140533282916716 (code B ref 18013); Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18013) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jul 2014 10:13:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54213 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X6dGT-0004LU-GV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 06:13:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mxin.ulb.ac.be ([164.15.128.112]:53275) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X6dGN-0004LD-LJ for 18013@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 06:13:43 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AisGANCsw1OkD4Xx/2dsb2JhbABZsEoBAQEBAQEGnG0BgS51hAQBBAF5BQsLISUPAQRJExmIFAEDCQixUY1iAYd/F4V7giKFAYItB4RDAQSEbAWUI4h0hF2CMIYWg0Y7 Original-Received: from mathsrv4.ulb.ac.be (HELO geodiff-mac3.ulb.ac.be) ([164.15.133.241]) by smtp.ulb.ac.be with ESMTP; 14 Jul 2014 12:13:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:06:55 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:91527 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > Nicolas Richard writes: > >> I'll admit that (looking-back "[^\n]") is not exactly the canonical way >> to test for (not (bolp)), but should it make an infloop ? I can't >> reproduce though. > > I don't think it infloops, it just takes a very long time. Since this > is running in a process filter interrupts are disabled, so you have to > be extra careful with what you do here. Thanks, I'll let it run more and see if it comes back to life (it should be faster since the connection certainly died meanwhile). -- Nico.