From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22534: File notify broken on Windows Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:51:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87io1zvsci.fsf@gmx.de> References: <838u30wbx5.fsf@gnu.org> <83fux7v56c.fsf@gnu.org> <871t8rm5x8.fsf@gmx.de> <83si17t02p.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpqhsrv3.fsf@gnu.org> <874mdllk0f.fsf@gmx.de> <83r3gpsjey.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8ncs9b4.fsf@gnu.org> <871t8nwl80.fsf@gmx.de> <831t8nqdk3.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3gnvwtt.fsf@gmx.de> <83pow7ouyy.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvrbvuol.fsf@gmx.de> <83k2mfot0h.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454964744 6136 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2016 20:52:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:52:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22534@debbugs.gnu.org, fabrice.popineau@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 08 21:52:10 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aSsn3-0005m3-HV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:52:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48737 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSsn2-0002ZH-Tr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:52:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58230) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSsmz-0002XJ-6g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:52:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSsmw-0002Fi-0B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:52:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51383) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSsmv-0002Fe-Ta for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:52:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aSsmv-0006BQ-ML for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:52:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 20:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22534 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22534-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22534.145496467923711 (code B ref 22534); Mon, 08 Feb 2016 20:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22534) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2016 20:51:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60524 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aSsmE-0006AN-QG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:51:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:51292) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aSsmD-0006AB-Rp for 22534@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:51:18 -0500 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([87.146.47.108]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MFPyK-1aGj9833si-00EMXF; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:51:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83k2mfot0h.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 08 Feb 2016 22:18:38 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:HwdEB1wbJaIXUIpJ65E8rCUeQ+45k82dAEnyyz1lotGrY0Z7gF3 Zmm0KXS4sHYgUrUcIHpn0X4/HDi8uUOHlZCmh751ggKvpZi8aBKDRAa1AnfQKEgPu0T8KbJ xQWZR1LPv+9ANxxEcbNlyquINmAeKgBuq44xMdvP18V9277k+AJZjKYKCnYVTvKb8l4u7rt 3VySeCObgefzXKKoXs1HA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:LWCt85MTD0w=:XboTOBakaYK2whZpWzQeQe s5lD64GaonApvbbnWh4ckJBiWpzkb/NzwWURerH1o1pUh9tRlgn5xAp9VhPLeAG+qjJmwFuLa YwEcipsapMyFIUPCM4nqvhqO2bU+LzR6cr5bpf+GWorCcYwK8OvB0Y6CH2lqxIgFOQZgS0/pg WOwpaBktXW/QihX0GCxcM82kO/8ynydsiE1s4LQDx23c72PHSExMiPqRkEBkQ8KtmOF4WGUdC L0NLVgAbk5C7eccFDBNId3qIo0LIUF/5kYbvU3n86Ing9HMnBgp1qTxLXmMKaB6/FGSd8a20t jE6tEsnJJw54UuEiwCS06oWkv33EH4UI5/nJ+H83a5LxODDxSLI0y/gag0DXtlWrXlOXFr0VU xqta99DZNYzvB4tT+baLqlb2bKN4VkbUAWuxcrj6BDBXoUvCghpxOCgsG1eDuX9ow8M/DXa9T ucykyf2dRf3fUCb5g+V8ulYNx+tioRuQk6o19voFJY0Ai6CCBsAs9trPjO2sUcXhOwox0uVuc TdIF0C2JINE7dEVQ270H58nXVPBmJq0yqHzwNvbDjO9JZw9unISmjfL4+NlyN8iJthHQsX1A2 kBeKGGaC5vv1oAo1E7gnE8qDxlnLorrt6dRxaAaI52H8E2syLgKmz8r2h375yD5fcSt+WKNbl 0LIuowrmRzDEd6+4jHXy7TeJnxz9LWiDuYJmlmR9uD0kpGUrU2Ura9tXJpYGMn0HiG9g+HvqP ECFVzHlBqU85mKWMtAyc7cxhMFDBHbsgnmal7rL4D/tWxZw7TX84J+jChLjbOSOrsg4fbnQ9 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:112744 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Expensive checks are skipped only for "make check" and "make >> check-maybe". "make file-notify-tests" run all possible tests in >> that file. > > That's inconsistent, won't you agree? No. If you want to run the tests of a given file, you don't want to discriminate them. Otherwise, you could run expensive tests in that file only when you call "make check-expensive". Not acceptable, IMO. Discriminating the tests is appropriate when running "make check". This shall give you an overview of Emacs' health in a short time. >> The syntax of selectors is given by ert. See (info "(ert) Test Selectors") > > I understood the syntax by looking at what Makefile does. But it's > hardly convenient (or pretty) to type Lisp expressions on the Make > command line, IMO. What would you recommend else? Introduce another syntax for selectors? Best regards, Michael.