From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23067: 25.0.92; A detail in the doc of query-replace Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 16:55:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87io0ay2kw.fsf@web.de> References: <87oaa9vrdz.fsf@web.de>>> <83k2kq27j0.fsf@gnu.org>>> <42d06a78-824b-4661-aa84-845def8ca855@default>> <837fgq1vr4.fsf@gnu.org>> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458921385 21354 80.91.229.3 (25 Mar 2016 15:56:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 15:56:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23067@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 25 16:56:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ajU5t-0002xV-D6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 16:56:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56743 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajU5s-0003IP-4l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:56:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35756) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajU5l-0003ID-4T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:56:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajU5h-0006oA-SM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:56:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40867) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajU5h-0006o6-Pn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:56:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ajU5h-0007Wb-IB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:56:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 15:56:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23067 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23067-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23067.145892134428900 (code B ref 23067); Fri, 25 Mar 2016 15:56:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23067) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Mar 2016 15:55:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37994 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ajU5P-0007W4-PY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:55:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:53611) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ajU5N-0007Vo-Ff for 23067@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:55:41 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.218.210.27]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MbhRh-1aQR670dNN-00J3Kq; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 16:55:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 25 Mar 2016 07:41:58 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:TPdCvXPpMdNpneX2v/3t6c+be0Hd4d0bLNVzoQlsS7nYsPcBoHE rdZiJbtjZzQ7U0+NkX8OZEFxAKmmKjld+6G5/IalTNH5gfxrYsjxkd+Y0+6tQeBALIf37Wb wLTc3yv2mWtxBhmsmV/VYWDr1r/fDLzwKYWtt/kga23cB08Rth/dnw9Yv1rndytWk8wWLgj SI9qEDGa7MTF1Gbjwf+3A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:2Uvc8RsZ7Jw=:kUJdCehGkCk5TgygdLqnHL riFJFc+85+yKm7TH+GsPW5PnAAGt2peS1fdhAuDoBUoFfSsbeWnfVgeZZKfFeskM/e+QG28yj JvjnT0goNthe06T8kPaYa+q3g92qXgNZki7frm2YdM4TrFYa/29gtEykcB9ES3vja3k1tjx7Y zicaA749vvN9ItKoBQilBPdm7ge6wqdv1308kfmU7z8dH3Ic/tsaBcQgXKG8Wjc1FdY9AfH1Y tRwk28YBfWUAwDtgZ5jXeo49RABg9qzwjVQaGij82JPUAsmx1/A6yALGFxgsh1vUFoWVyHsH1 XaiyGq1e4kVEayhW1bFGht8lVWYB3P8wmYPqca08Py7Lh0ayxnlwFai86BeGGGBhbKWBD0ixm 3ZHYJdVB8VCQjx5YYhX1grV378pmHotemKL10mdmsnESioBOpW8yZ3UPVs4cw2nM1Nj+Gg42r VdAfgSDeSb+SG0ikdT3FQPzPwOHN0FK5vEAGeibBrHRz6wlJEwyVqHASzURd1ANCCTjoQ7SkG Wvcl3VLL9+g5c8x9gRLDBGtFRSqooUbrGya4l3yL9E7npwO7FXSwNL5njc9FybRLQtMuxm2IW CxBjUUA+9xQutKQImnVsI+VnsJ2ZD8oUlDdZmx1KwzDnHh+gUVq28uhBzndP+hSTHCAKo/ano BhUHnMptcuc8Gpz3VbtJlTb/C8dKpNaZwKZ1lOMT0ZNOBQdR4iADdVVnAy1eZudHQvLk9ZUBB jkyeRghckulBvz39/CHvcLHgQqyKu62UPABV/5k3tsVBZ8aRLIdbnP4d7IUrQulFNycZIXLW X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:115485 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > If we do say things like that then that gives credence to an > impression that "end of buffer" might not always mean `point-max' > (otherwise, we would not contrast it with a description of the buffer > end when there is a restriction). I don't think that "end-of-buffer" is such a good synonym for `point-max'. But OTOH, this is consistent with widely used functions as `eobp' and `end-of-buffer'. I didn't realize this when I created this report. Since we will undoubtedly not rename these functions, it's best to leave things as they are. I still think it was not wrong to clear up things in this special case, because to the user it could have made sense that query-replace indeed would operate up to the real end of the buffer. Thanks, Michael.