From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alexis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20611: 24.4; mutt slow in ansi-term Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:22:09 +1000 Message-ID: <87inzml5n2.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a8x1roby.fsf@apollo.hindleynet> <8737qwvuo3.fsf@mbork.pl> <20160409073937.GH1897@hindley.org.uk> <83mvp3i0l1.fsf@gnu.org> <20160410091526.GA25798@hindley.org.uk> <83d1pxgzy6.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuut2jfy.fsf@gmail.com> <83y48kf838.fsf@gnu.org> <87shyrntpm.fsf@gmail.com> <83lh4ig83z.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1460507005 18295 80.91.229.3 (13 Apr 2016 00:23:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:23:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mark@hindley.org.uk, mbork@mbork.pl, 20611@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 13 02:23:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aq8aN-0007Pi-OO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 02:23:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60562 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aq8aM-0002BI-Vr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 20:23:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34892) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aq8aI-00028L-Px for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 20:23:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aq8aD-0006Gp-Q4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 20:23:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49019) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aq8aD-0006Gl-MO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 20:23:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aq8aD-00069u-Ii for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 20:23:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alexis Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20611 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20611-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20611.146050694123622 (code B ref 20611); Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20611) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Apr 2016 00:22:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33123 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aq8ZZ-00068v-0B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 20:22:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f67.google.com ([209.85.220.67]:35767) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aq8ZX-00068g-LD for 20611@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 20:22:20 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f67.google.com with SMTP id zy2so2458875pac.2 for <20611@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 17:22:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=PfT2owa5DVxuPeyVxP8k4Po07i9NAVFoTkoL4M2jt3U=; b=EgIzqU+px7J3TbSO25gmG3ERHK62GL21jpfMpAiYW71oSczYo9A5HzqXVdMJJvQ/ZE 0GSyMukUIYJMNO3Qn2SBhZOp25u2Ym/hdR2UIK2Q7gdbyPtSlfgQ88R7kCmN/qmJgtaj mkYPs1fJ5Hf0UYoBjhx19AvjW+QUfPnwIN4QQ3cx8fcfwT2ZPCRqKW64qpbpAuzBj+Az Ki4qXWnPwRXUkZO2Ztn+x2TPhlVWFwofDS4l11mjUagyFmvp69afF9NzamPwJs9c/mv6 uZ4EQmUhDjHhzPNp32VvqNesYNPiDZeu8PmEJStSC99xpGPQrsGIK/j7Z5TFxp0x9mzd 3r6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=PfT2owa5DVxuPeyVxP8k4Po07i9NAVFoTkoL4M2jt3U=; b=KjRaj/gCz0/F2U8mzDjM0j8eqWhN8BkhLDWTAct0/SAYnqPenFBxg4jDcLe/raiuyP WWzTAs/knmCl9ErcyGw0gAvqVoETgcerfft7h3O5GD0VHx9pP/DySy0awY563VlyOQvG ifdqHT/SZy3uSmUT9ob8SDwqeX8zGnjWAF5TWOkPSgBX0SjdXAln8IAhVnbj1Aegl8Fp 1uFF9JH/uwVWKHrllWBiOxymaKopem9KLa7F2rhNETbl8zZk/6dH9z9HaG9VnII32mjE jB6Dcbmb64kFdwIbeVDXlXSRDSspWntEnYiIMqcaX9SCi001r610wrlwJw+454RH/Uux lK1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FU/bTp7463Q/mqZULCX6iC1iMu7e5pTDV3AD7XzReIGhtDbL0JH26rC12wjNm7kWQ== X-Received: by 10.66.169.109 with SMTP id ad13mr8716920pac.20.1460506933826; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 17:22:13 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (124-168-216-210.dyn.iinet.net.au. [124.168.216.210]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f66sm46246771pff.8.2016.04.12.17.22.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Apr 2016 17:22:13 -0700 (PDT) User-agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 24.5.3 In-reply-to: <83lh4ig83z.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:116424 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > If in Emacs 24 or 25 you set bidi-display-reordering to nil in > the *ansi-term* buffer, do you see any significant speedup? i do, in both; with `bidi-display-reordering' set to nil, i don't notice any significant lag in either version. > Another thing to try is load term.el from Emacs 23 into Emacs 24 > or 25, and see if that results in any speedup. Not that i noticed, no.