From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24925: 25.1.50; Suboptimal explanation of FACESPEC in (elisp) Search-based Fontification Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 18:06:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87inrueyjw.fsf@web.de> References: <87mvh6f0o9.fsf@web.de> <83wpgac6om.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478884183 2778 195.159.176.226 (11 Nov 2016 17:09:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 17:09:43 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 24925@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 11 18:09:38 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c5FKG-00060o-8T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 18:09:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54102 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c5FKJ-0004JO-3i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 12:09:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35149) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c5FIB-0002K6-Lw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 12:07:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c5FI6-0007Gg-Os for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 12:07:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38741) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c5FI6-0007GW-LD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 12:07:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c5FI6-0001Kv-BC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 12:07:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 17:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24925 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24925-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24925.14788840015111 (code B ref 24925); Fri, 11 Nov 2016 17:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24925) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2016 17:06:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54140 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c5FHk-0001KN-Qx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 12:06:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:53101) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c5FHi-0001K9-UG for 24925@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 12:06:39 -0500 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([90.186.2.120]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb001 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lcgp5-1cUeLv0q3T-00kBxY; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 18:06:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83wpgac6om.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 11 Nov 2016 18:39:05 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:oo1b5FMidIMPypTaN7oASwxMUV5OpafF+qhkJ6AJdSbaHQMYsmz H43QbcV8ZcyJBOcitZMfA4tdLew9LegXCvDAMG3cmaxJr9GZ2Vr+yB3jPVltmtFELlpq080 w0kWz317fsOsYGlxXceWrew05XIce3fkreDb/f1+/G1wBTsOwZQCeAeb0garz65EBFW64Ij K77r+MNfxKzxUe+Bj9maA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:8CRd1+uGD1E=:2SNNfYhkGw0doBjnMvUT0h jbGaotdk78+/haRlZYh+VJ595h2bLyXEuMGYgvbWOHrZfAjDTk7imiDGJ1TLIuByO5/1/Dapx 64NXh56DKed1zar5N40oJq4wgCbuZ4vGhNtj02zFJ3ziORgAOfl+JjARBXykhCrly8qWHfD4B ekEI+E4nsxssrMXTRjArzqVgpflzfDU975n/r2hkUK7JaxmVAgfcCYUBex4xp0dJxHRu6Dg6n S9KADLPPPGYQanrpQ6m+Av7st0Mq+wllzvOaonf+9EyfXF620lNxuv2KiWBJV78dybotcfBOT GUr8OqFnyW1JTshTBCUnQ2PUCY0lMBtit4e3dMhzCnwCNfwbmFLHy2ffzyJcVyZvjo1E7YZ2X wBfXhINmhiNpLVJrZEK9oCM+wOPTPOxTN9X9gav951k3XCnX1WzWOszbEVuKPeVJW7EKGZdwt 7HcOktz2j6rim9UykZhY06/s1uVUukoZuWAKdKSZDVTLmGbFhXnmwHQqx9YvrAJWV/UJfhsJQ dvLMdYZX6uzlfDOXki32pbavwGUaJZ058uHjgYb6gVqi+gBf0Zj8xFhlQDz64YeRF9cteYI7Y Wtm/djAy1Cp8xPgxBKijNfJyHBS0AE6b6kvkX1gmkD3G99codcG/kjH/teixKRoP2ji8JLVp3 7hwkjqJlUQzGOxK7zb88QohEZSXODLk6pTc1HQR28YCJEQA6DA4rPWq/l9tWSgCbCoSsl6zCg F6XirvZazgp7ssASNpgWLvHsDhJy+33YytZmDFovMBfKMoetny+orKPTTxKxfodOaeKPnTBG X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:125630 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > From: Michael Heerdegen > > Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 17:20:38 +0100 > > > > In this kind of element, FACESPEC is an expression whose value > > specifies the face to use for highlighting. In the simplest case, > > FACESPEC is a Lisp variable (a symbol) whose value is a face name. > > > > The first sentence is not good because an expression has no associated > > value. > > ??? An expression certainly can have a value. I really think that first sentence can be interpreted in different ways when being read - see the rest of what I said. Let's be more specific: say that the expression is evaluated dynamically, and that the according return value at that time is used. In contrast to having "a" value; like evaluating only one time when the spec is added, or expecting the expression to be constant. Michael.