From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36780: 26.1; request: savehist should also save log-edit-comment-ring by default Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 20:36:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87imqnbuf0.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87blwgforq.fsf@gnus.org> <83blwgb6ni.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="202042"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacsuser@freemail.hu, 36780@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 23 20:48:33 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i1Ebw-000qL3-Lx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 20:48:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32782 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i1Ebu-0004mn-P0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:48:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40209) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i1EQp-0003Ha-Hu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:37:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i1EQo-000112-7y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:37:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60589) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i1EQo-00010t-3I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i1EQn-0003Gw-W7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 18:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36780 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36780-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36780.156658541912566 (code B ref 36780); Fri, 23 Aug 2019 18:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36780) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Aug 2019 18:36:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41177 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i1EQl-0003Gc-3g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:36:59 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:50824) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i1EQj-0003GP-CA for 36780@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:36:57 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i1EQe-0001RX-C5; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 20:36:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83blwgb6ni.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 23 Aug 2019 11:57:53 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:165715 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I don't see why the solution of customizing > savehist-additional-variables by the user is not the right one. After > all, we are not talking about minibuffer history here. > > The savehist package defines itself as being for "saving the > minibuffer history". Oh, I thought it was a more general facility. In that case, I'm closing this bug report. > What you suggest makes it a much more general facility, and we then > would need to review many other variables and decide whether they are > candidates for saving (some of them are already saved by separate > features). Maybe we should do that, but that's a much broader issue > than this particular bug report. Yup. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no