From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2160: 23.0.60; Indentation of LOOP (cl-indent.el) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 06:53:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87imhh3779.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87ab956pyk.fsf@freebits.de> <87pnjifc4o.fsf@gnus.org> <87o8ti86r3.fsf@stefankangas.se> <8736ab15ww.fsf@gnus.org> <87o8sq4hbz.fsf@stefankangas.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="57138"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: tcr@freebits.de, 2160@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 30 06:54:39 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jU1Da-000ElS-VI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 06:54:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45632 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jU1Da-00052W-2A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 00:54:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50938) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jU1D0-0004eV-LZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 00:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jU1D0-0003jV-5z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 00:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33638) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jU1Cz-0003jQ-Pg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 00:54:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jU1Cz-0003xJ-LV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 00:54:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 04:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 2160 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 2160-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B2160.158822242415181 (code B ref 2160); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 04:54:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2160) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2020 04:53:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45184 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jU1Ci-0003wn-9k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 00:53:44 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:51332) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jU1Cf-0003wY-Tp for 2160@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 00:53:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=RYisOIcu6jD3+FBXJybupAf69gzBGjt2Q4cTmDhATqI=; b=I6SQoQpDlplcdg045bHmjuGlL1 RPkwgtNvDl6b7e00XD4cbyDUMxySfLN6NNjRgnPKTQcvHg5VTWdwEf4WPR/DKHT4G8+m89SAAFjoN nFOobPMa7PC3kTnEK3c3fyrLPJWyQBqPzypkJcfSX6clWodjc2kztOoXucrFUnpqju7c=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jU1CV-0005FP-Bt; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 06:53:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87o8sq4hbz.fsf@stefankangas.se> (Stefan Kangas's message of "Sat, 21 Mar 2020 02:39:12 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:179373 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas writes: > I just realized that the suggestion as is makes code like this indent > weirdly: > > (loop > for item in list > for i from 1 to 10 > do (something)) > > The better indenting in my taste would be what we have now: > > (loop > for item in list > for i from 1 to 10 > do (something)) > > This is from an example I found online. Not sure how common this is > in practice. The former looks like what I'd expect (as a Common Lisp programmer). Except that I would never ever do a newline after "(loop ". -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no