From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49803: 27.2; Mouse wheel on MacOS is reported as mouse-4 and mouse-5, but Emacs mwheel seems to use wheel-up/wheel-down instead Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 09:48:18 +0200 Message-ID: <87im0bqf25.fsf@gmail.com> References: <83a6m1ofgi.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1fcm6rh.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0kusygj.fsf@gmail.com> <83v94dfozn.fsf@gnu.org> <87v94cqqop.fsf@gmail.com> <83sfzgdw96.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1f0qb6m.fsf@gmail.com> <83mtpodjd4.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtpnrjok.fsf@gmail.com> <83h7fvevat.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22740"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: didibus@gmail.com, 49803@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 12 09:49:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mE5Se-0005gI-J0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 09:49:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42296 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mE5Sd-00060h-9B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 03:49:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52758) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mE5SY-00060X-59 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 03:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54055) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mE5SX-0000V8-TT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 03:49:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mE5SX-00078a-I5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 03:49:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 07:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49803 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 49803-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49803.162875450827385 (code B ref 49803); Thu, 12 Aug 2021 07:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49803) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Aug 2021 07:48:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37368 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mE5Rz-00077d-Ns for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 03:48:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com ([209.85.221.53]:43702) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mE5Ry-00077N-0t for 49803@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 03:48:26 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id z9so6837049wrh.10 for <49803@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:48:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Son2/3EVtBv+Rj9G1PuPQHpd/treP2muSsYXXa2v97w=; b=PLj3MaF82T71ULggTD1qc5XpWx0rhkdiKRxgMAd9F0BMQ5II8wLcsF1TyVbcUIpFUo zk+RF+ILmIgB1b8ERxd241T92Ki1BS/ijAk/NGrZmX1w/TE+WFv2jiTSuXmulgRhP8VS XxQTe2neQBCzqtKfaboLHXc//ZGt1S6SL5Dt+JEYmHNkippDP4eD3jmSttg7+oKymA8W YtWMIWui/YRdF2XF9RQwEsCOppj+E2MoGA26BtKjD34M4o26cvQRcnIAioKQh6l/87VE tCpizFBk5oMAj/NE154q+0Y4KCDnlAVHd4W3OxGDTa0I2pjp/WL6ySZP4BEk78hJqjz8 GYRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Son2/3EVtBv+Rj9G1PuPQHpd/treP2muSsYXXa2v97w=; b=Q/VYkAfLow61vCxVooGkBEgvkbZf0ePNaZ+fq6Ns9N0wHgOZ/Mou2qH+13fDMOpVkH omMBlRQLq2b1nKxFJDj8J0BECBlNClKbDGQmw0YI53sxmn31tasZh+bqHrKjt1YMOMYf nLivYq0/r5vrKy3eqrxy3KZ6RHINnUetwmPtniF6GzCUs+WAi6AeJXX4p/pR+fBmAdEe OaLjZSwapqsXPlGuez73Pxus96ZthmUHVaHBb3TW7hF7MsxNVT1C9WJQgIFdB9nKORQf d77HNMAsucP6Z6n5ogXTi1ysZImilR/PeV0MYAKStrVI/kyqFghaWEDGD6VxXCAd+RQF RGWw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531WCyailthbCu/rGWEBNmrPWLHuOUOJCCe4lUZULgAMXsu3/N/G xgYztbxU/Zeh3oaqWKWUfMisix6eNw0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwoFpFiQg7BZS5Z+WsZVkhpnUmw0OKCMCOs8SGToSswSEM6/MOLwbAncVsbKcEDjnnlsDUtjg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ed50:: with SMTP id u16mr2502621wro.174.1628754499805; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([82.66.8.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z7sm4030439wmi.4.2021.08.12.00.48.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:48:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83h7fvevat.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 11 Aug 2021 20:38:18 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:211645 Archived-At: >>>>> On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 20:38:18 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: >> +(defcustom xterm-mouse-map-buttons >> + (if (featurep 'ns-win) >> + t >> + nil) >> + "Non-nil if xterm should perfom mouse button mappings. >> +Will use `xterm-mouse-map-buttons-alist' for the mapping. >> +Defaults to t when using macOS for consistency with 'mwheel'." >> + :type 'boolean >> + :version "28.1" >> + :group 'xterm) Eli> So you are saying that by moving this from mwheel.el, we avoid the Eli> danger of using the wrong mapping on TTY frames on macOS? With the caveat that we=CA=BCre not moving anything from mwheel, but rather adapting xt-mouse to mwheel's expectations, yes. I think that=CA=BCs a better idea than adapting mwheel to have frame-specific values for mouse-wheel-{up,down}-event. Robert --=20