From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51897: 29.0.50; keymap-global-unset cannot unset C-x C-z Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:53:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87ilwrp69v.fsf@gnus.org> References: <97c62cc1-dbaf-a747-5a52-0f5b217850dd@inventati.org> <87sfvwq6vz.fsf@gnus.org> <831r3g0wel.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtm3rkjv.fsf@gnus.org> <83zgq3zz6j.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30293"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: manuel.uberti@inventati.org, 51897@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 17 08:56:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mnFnj-0007h4-1w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:56:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40480 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mnFnh-00065N-U0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 02:56:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40064) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mnFla-0004aH-GF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 02:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48443) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mnFla-0004rC-7s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 02:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mnFla-0005Is-6R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 02:54:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 07:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51897 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 51897-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51897.163713562520348 (code B ref 51897); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 07:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51897) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2021 07:53:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59989 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mnFlI-0005I6-VS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 02:53:45 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:34644) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mnFlH-0005Hj-3x for 51897@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 02:53:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=wfE5I6cPbCPdHzi75v1pG8ElrE/G30CUnAjYSS0x3gM=; b=WqDLXkGfGwidvs7rxfvzX91M9v jBBZ7Xe+rRpV5rnCxhx7bdHke8DWQHjqqyON3YD0FXQSkiDxMdyV3sDEAzRXjhp7P2vfi+CHCECDe WhaICKgbKb4Wy+5zOfz/tle/Yxz2srdHcpZIqs4Cw4p9wBLDxY/R5rMwjlpJG8qXaTw0=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mnFl7-0005oa-8K; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:53:36 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEVHP0cmQI6MenXR ycn////P/ekvAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+ULEQcVOXjXWeMAAAG6SURBVDjLhVSJkeMw DEOoBtapgCYb0JH993YgJTvJ7t6ck/FkBOMhJAeP4/cLb8BZt+f5HXia2SlqP4ADX8DxeEk9/+VB wM2tLvUIS/4IX0A+w1QAyQxPFc888bDj+FMEAFywnGKZc5mL2bRNCHA9cTQDrkOUhCUUOQv4KvPJ AUYJNSGAJaVIqLWzGY30AgxDRZrAexE2ICoh2g7Fs3kBoDGtJY0jVC6xLSXUGrqihlXus4Hg1IGK mu18AwmDV1RfzhK6pJI6nKJnJgGkLsZInWBJmwCWvVOVIz9MxJbVBb4YzMOqqiSrxhIYGxgcSosg BspxogXQLkZwgc4sYMxxAz5HVNs1gyblLoBdpWclGjFY9g208qQ1XIIjvYDR5ZWHVy8bmF0PV9mf T38BVQMJYNiRTXhJYdT56ZpqPc59fPi0F29MtJIuwBi0jCmIJsy9tR4Vp9Y3YWJvlM82kFjrmeMl BfabNXO+paIvhYo3OtINWDuQt2aoTu45CAy9HPID6LFrhA9A+luHdAe7ALrM2vTaE//simmNu65L 7w1Q5XtYFX8zF/QLjSvYvR88+fWi70ku4H//Ph/XX9FVbhYgJO4MAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0 ZQAyMDIxLTExLTE3VDA3OjIxOjU3KzAwOjAwlPRuVwAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMS0x MS0xN1QwNzoyMTo1NyswMDowMOWp1usAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: The Beatles's _1967-1970 (1)_: "Hey Jude" In-Reply-To: <83zgq3zz6j.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 16 Nov 2021 21:19:00 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:220182 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Are you using "C-x v v", perhaps? At some point in the past I > proposed to teach "C-x v v" to suggest a push after commit, or even > optionally do a push without asking, given some user customization. > But that idea was shot down for reasons I still don't understand. > I think keeping push out of the "C-x v v" cycle makes that command > much less useful nowadays. I do see the objection from a standpoint of "well, a commit and a push are two totally separate operations" Git standpoint, but I think it might be helpful to have as an option. After thinking about it a bit more, I'm not quite sure what I'd prefer myself. It's not uncommon for me that I remember something after I've hit `C-x v v' (like adding Copyright-paperwork-exempt: yes to the commit message), and having this be a two step operation helps with that, because I can just back out the commit and try again, which I can't if I've already pushed. But on the other hand, I forget to push so often that it's ridiculous. I think one of the contributing factors is that it just takes a while -- I mean, I have to pull first, wait for it to finish, and then push. Perhaps I should just make a command that does both pull (and if there's no errors) and a push. I think I'll try to experiment a bit and try to see if there's anything that can be generalised as a vc command. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no