From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50988: 26.3; gnus-cloud gets wrong chunk byte count writing sync from windows Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 17:04:19 +0200 Message-ID: <87illqj8uk.fsf@dod.no> References: <86o886jym9.fsf@dod.no> <87wna8ao08.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgf3ji91.fsf@dod.no> <87tu5a9ltd.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10728"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 50988@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 14 17:05:13 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oYTwu-0002Zz-MG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 17:05:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34050 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oYTwt-0007Wd-Bd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:05:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53842) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oYTwk-0007W6-Tu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38829) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oYTwk-0002LC-Lw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oYTwk-0000d7-Fl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Steinar Bang Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 15:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50988 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 50988-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50988.16631678702378 (code B ref 50988); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 15:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50988) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2022 15:04:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55761 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oYTwD-0000cH-It for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:04:29 -0400 Original-Received: from cadalora.bang.priv.no ([46.43.15.90]:50040) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oYTwB-0000c2-LN for 50988@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:04:28 -0400 Original-Received: from marquez (unknown [84.210.87.211]) by cadalora.bang.priv.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B8621056BF; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 16:04:20 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <87tu5a9ltd.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 14 Sep 2022 14:34:22 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:242479 Archived-At: >>>>> Lars Ingebrigtsen : > Steinar Bang writes: >> (also, I'm now using a debian GNU/linux laptop, so I don't see any >> CRLF/LF related issues (which I still think this was, even if Eli >> doesn't). (Because if I remember correctly, the diff in byte count matched the line number...) >> I.e. not easy to reproduce) > OK, then I guess there won't be any further progress in this bug report, > and I'm closing it. If you do see this problem again, please respond to > the debbugs address and we'll reopen. +1