From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58951: [PATCH] ; Fix handling of 'not' by 'buffer-match-p' Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 22:18:04 +0000 Message-ID: <87iljyco9v.fsf@posteo.net> References: <871qqmeac3.fsf@posteo.net> <44629860-db9a-d6f7-8188-e7a5b73ea48e@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30348"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 58951@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 01 23:19:44 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1opzbk-0007fJ-0w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 23:19:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opzbZ-0007Lj-Mq; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 18:19:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opzbX-0007Kz-SH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 18:19:32 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opzb4-0002fK-B8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 18:19:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1opzb3-0005Ut-UL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 18:19:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Philip Kaludercic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 22:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58951 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 58951-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58951.166734109521077 (code B ref 58951); Tue, 01 Nov 2022 22:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58951) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2022 22:18:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44375 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1opzaI-0005Tt-Sf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 18:18:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:49279) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1opzaH-0005Tb-0J for 58951@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 18:18:13 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09067240027 for <58951@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 23:18:06 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1667341087; bh=DqKK1fSA0QDSzCSumuv5pw4RBBFN7CWuAiiO8RKU+48=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=emUIoWC5VeT1U9+2y0s4z4ompncI4L+mXs1QbhLS7/M40UVjz2ZXNVuvcbLMS/Tg1 QOvP0M43mehor7kM5qnBEgJ9UV/TmZ71TNyUY4FhwErHrEASs9BMFRHK3kT32YseYO 9taqZAlcSBgJefKlhXsUX53JqLE0PBu+j7nKVGKvYZwsJjzQbnBYQdYAgJp2kcvzd7 EfUiujElVbH4LJlA+mfcHnxyz3rmfSQnzObf/NDOQxlRysYP8dzhJZCQG4VLQrI9p4 zdSvGW2UCxjr3GEham3fPEyi4sKWDtw+xQBb9VyqSaYaFIzpGzVcpgwew4tqIV+1qo NKHkAgyAz2jFQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4N24Cf0zzkz6tmK; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 23:18:05 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <44629860-db9a-d6f7-8188-e7a5b73ea48e@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Wed, 2 Nov 2022 00:09:11 +0200") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=nopreference; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:246812 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 01.11.2022 21:36, Philip Kaludercic wrote: >> I believe this is preferable to fixing `show-paren-predicate', as this >> is the kind of issue a lot of people could trip over. >> This patch is based on the patch from bug#58950, but can be >> back-ported >> to the previous implementations if there are any issues with that report. > > I do agree that (not foo) is more convenient than (not . foo). Though > the latter would be more regular compared to the rest of the syntax. I > made just that mistake yesterday. > > Let's change 'pcase' to 'pcase-exhaustive', though? So it will signal > an error on invalid syntax. Right, that is what I did in bug#58950 and what led me to notice the mistake.