From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Manuel Giraud via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#63311: 30.0.50; [PATCH] smtpmail-send-it split Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 22:59:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87ilcypot3.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> References: <87jzxmsyyr.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83ttwqhahy.fsf@gnu.org> <874joq34bk.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83o7mygevr.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn1hzv9j.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <871qjoe7cw.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <837ctf575q.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Manuel Giraud Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7481"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 63311@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 11 23:00:24 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pxDOh-0001m5-Vg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 May 2023 23:00:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pxDOP-0006sP-5S; Thu, 11 May 2023 17:00:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pxDON-0006sF-9V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2023 17:00:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pxDOM-0005SC-S4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2023 17:00:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pxDOM-0005Us-O3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2023 17:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Manuel Giraud Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 21:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63311 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 63311-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63311.168383876921061 (code B ref 63311); Thu, 11 May 2023 21:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 63311) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2023 20:59:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53534 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pxDNp-0005Tc-3a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2023 16:59:29 -0400 Original-Received: from ledu-giraud.fr ([51.159.28.247]:23771) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pxDNm-0005TR-R6 for 63311@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2023 16:59:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=ed25519; bh=JdZz0fp4 QDd3QDQXEkvkh8zkdJGNgMxSLPaL++51mog=; h=date:references:in-reply-to: subject:cc:to:from; d=ledu-giraud.fr; b=l4fWshQ2D+osptB5PtBoYlteQt4fEX oIfmTnVsNppquO0bbNllV+SzQvRYQSZrWqSjePdfHO2E8Zg73ca4KNDA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=rsa; bh=JdZz0fp4QDd3QDQX Ekvkh8zkdJGNgMxSLPaL++51mog=; h=date:references:in-reply-to:subject: cc:to:from; d=ledu-giraud.fr; b=d9hZ3DCeSovTHAEoFKR2+jPNIFKNEvau6IY/hK dpXZ8xFVMyvq2LnfWlSnadpKThRMH5gyXzwavXZKlah7Q0QxzG/BklJE9GE0wFnh5smuLJ qlKc2cpqtvKrSZ66+ofuoM/ZbHYEVftH3mUhUnWtKVhuC52DVUHGi6g4PU0APY5bpdPUWE vVLoXDbRLeb+0VD2YNWzAIzS8iU7oXLUINTf5iKT6q/k7MvAgmSlGZuI7uqcK+vRK3kkDG woC/F9LbQ382Svr99m9r1i5zFeBzXsYe0osKhUJdgIBo1MphIMSV0YJolj7ryvTWgZFIec pbChHSz2cBdocokC8ttf4fVg== Original-Received: from computer ( [10.1.1.1]) by ledu-giraud.fr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id c209fb75 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 11 May 2023 22:59:24 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <837ctf575q.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 11 May 2023 16:28:33 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:261591 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Manuel Giraud >> Cc: 63311@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 13:47:11 +0200 >> >> So I guess, my question is how does one mix Lisp thread with >> unwind-protect? > > I'm not sure I understand why you need to. The two unwind-protect > handlers will run at different times and most probably will need to > unwind different stuff, although there could be overlap. So why is it > a problem to have two separate unwind forms? I was not talking about two separate unwind forms. I was talking about *thread* and unwind. Here is a minimal example that exhibits my problem: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (setq-local lexical-binding t) (defun my-problem () (interactive) (let ((buf (generate-new-buffer "*foo*"))) (with-current-buffer buf (insert "secret message")) (unwind-protect (make-thread #'(lambda () (with-current-buffer buf (sit-for 10) (message (buffer-string))))) (kill-buffer buf)))) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- The thread won't have a chance to do its job since the buffer will already be dead. -- Manuel Giraud