From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6501: 24.0.50; Unify finder keyword usage -- emulation/emulations Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:59:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87hbkrwcfm.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87y6e4x0mf.fsf@gmail.com> <87mxuk9m2s.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277499278 18310 80.91.229.12 (25 Jun 2010 20:54:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:54:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6501@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 25 22:54:36 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSFv1-0001bB-R7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 22:54:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37367 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OSFoN-00081M-2t for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:47:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54222 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OSD2n-0004TF-EW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:50:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OS81s-0004ES-8O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:29:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58019) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OS81s-0004Dw-5b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:29:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OS7ag-00088B-Bf; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6501 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6501-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6501.127746720431231 (code B ref 6501); Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6501) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2010 12:00:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OS7Zj-00087g-FY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:00:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OS7Zg-00087D-ON for 6501@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:00:01 -0400 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so141468fga.15 for <6501@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:59:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=HcXw5bOuxNsIeaZH0U5/GK3+ZxiYAjIGpRgqAsyFvN8=; b=gPFDZpv1G1u35Yp+Bqknypfa/YFF4J0ACt9RpqSHC78zBt6igIBZNzHDHfv9Ye/eMB wKk7Tjna3nvekpmWvdelOMH/sbVaa2MY+PKSW3xYgvBYnc+TLYG/RiWMaWgECvFTx3Vc P6eabBsJ/YzVQ7vN1SqKYK3Mxzm4OwRxCLOrQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; b=LiJzXU2vTt71lM+P82NRDaPXfAH72B6tBOTbQ8zBkOIcGfPQmr53mYPegxOhEjPuOV ELh85ru6LgdwTFyvH+VXd0PjIE1aMYhV0NNTN8be+N5HgjWYBLkKM3KvMFrP0qcV/Ayn UcC1J0hdD05O8+T3bK4TX/25n7PRblQUdDvmo= Original-Received: by 10.87.35.20 with SMTP id n20mr999448fgj.0.1277467194927; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:59:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([88.103.132.186]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 26sm152547fks.22.2010.06.25.04.59.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:59:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87mxuk9m2s.fsf@mail.jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:57:07 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:01:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:38009 Archived-At: Juri Linkov writes: >> There is currently both "emulation" and "emulations" occuring as finder >> keywords. Wouldn't it be better if only one of them were used? >> "Emulation" seems better to me, but "emulations" is used in majority of >> cases. > > "emulations" is a standard keyword defined in finder-known-keywords > in finder.el as "emulations of other editors" (though the subdirectory's > name is "emulation"). So we could change the keyword "emulation" > to "emulations" in 3 packages: > > * hl-line.el:: highlight the current line. > * cua-base.el:: emulate CUA key bindings. > * pc-select.el:: emulate mark, cut, copy and paste from Motif. Yes. Or we could change the existing "emulations" to "emulation"... That's why I didn't come up with a patch -- I would prefer "emulation", but have no idea what success I'm going to have with such a proposal. I can certainly live with "emulations" as well; let's just unify it.