From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7548: [FIXED] bookmark-default-handler wrong documentation Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:58:04 -0500 Message-ID: <87hbejc4ir.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <87r5dsd6nw.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292174745 22638 80.91.229.12 (12 Dec 2010 17:25:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 17:25:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7548@debbugs.gnu.org, Chong Yidong To: Leo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 12 18:25:41 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRpg4-0002a6-S6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 18:25:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51713 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PRpg4-0002JB-9G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:25:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35825 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PRpg0-0002J4-Dn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:25:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PRpfz-0000re-3R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:25:36 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59881) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PRpfy-0000rY-TG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:25:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRp9W-0005NQ-2X; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:52:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Karl Fogel Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 16:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7548 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7548-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7548.129217271820659 (code B ref 7548); Sun, 12 Dec 2010 16:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7548) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2010 16:51:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRp9S-0005NA-KL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:51:58 -0500 Original-Received: from osh-net-219-98.onshore.net ([66.146.219.98] helo=sanpietro.red-bean.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRp9R-0005My-2n for 7548@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:51:57 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43168 helo=floss ident=kfogel) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PRpFM-0000ll-Tr; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 10:58:05 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:55:23 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:52:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:42441 Archived-At: Leo writes: >On 2010-12-08 08:12 +0000, Karl Fogel wrote: >> Thanks, Leo and Theirry. Fixed in bzr rev 102609. Specifically: > >I wonder if this can be moved to 23.3. I generally just put things on trunk and trust they will make it into a release at some point. However, if you can point me to some documentation about the proper way to put things on release branches, I would do that (I haven't been able to find such docs in the tree, but maybe I'm not looking in the right places). Best, -Karl