From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14344: 24.3.50; incorrect doc for `eval-defun-2' Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 23:50:44 +0300 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87haifkf2z.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <87txmfkgbb.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <53DC12D5112C41D6A262A6C1C291B7FD@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1367873601 4383 80.91.229.3 (6 May 2013 20:53:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 20:53:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14344@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 06 22:53:18 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UZSPN-0000uX-4r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 22:53:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46087 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZSPM-0002dG-Re for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 16:53:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48063) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZSPF-0002bj-63 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 16:53:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZSP9-00009f-Tf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 16:53:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56127) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZSP9-00008g-O5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 16:53:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UZSQ5-0001RM-SO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 16:54:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 20:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14344 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14344-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14344.13678736185466 (code B ref 14344); Mon, 06 May 2013 20:54:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14344) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2013 20:53:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60236 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UZSPh-0001Q6-1f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 16:53:37 -0400 Original-Received: from ps18281.dreamhost.com ([69.163.218.105]:53896 helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UZSPe-0001Pz-A9 for 14344@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 16:53:35 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87813258B9E91C; Mon, 6 May 2013 13:52:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53DC12D5112C41D6A262A6C1C291B7FD@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 6 May 2013 13:45:28 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:74025 Archived-At: > in his report for bug #12985 Kelly Dean did NOT ask to fix the same > doc string. Bug #14344 is about the doc string of `eval-defun-2'. That > function and its doc string are not even mentioned in bug #12985. He asked to fix "print value in minibuffer." which should be "print value into echo area."