From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9803: [PATCH] Add ERT option to skip test Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 08:44:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87hacd21zr.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87vc0usnrj.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1382165174 12248 80.91.229.3 (19 Oct 2013 06:46:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 06:46:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9803@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 19 08:46:17 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VXQIj-0005KG-Ci for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 08:46:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60519 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VXQIj-0005Yj-1Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 02:46:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36283) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VXQIa-0005Yd-RO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 02:46:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VXQIV-00042N-0P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 02:46:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43559) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VXQIU-00042H-TE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 02:46:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VXQIU-0008D8-Es for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 02:46:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 06:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9803 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9803-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9803.138216510831500 (code B ref 9803); Sat, 19 Oct 2013 06:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9803) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2013 06:45:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57578 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VXQHb-0008Bx-3E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 02:45:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:57809) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VXQHY-0008B4-6A for 9803@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 02:45:04 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([93.202.48.191]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPS (Nemesis) id 0MOw4N-1VcfTq1fd9-006RTF for <9803@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 08:44:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 18 Oct 2013 22:12:24 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:E0N7YL6IYl/zocHkX/OX3yABPEMLPF+u2kxGeKZTrRs/nxYU0UU YCzyQR3BIUDw8a6LLcoG4R5NW8MZJT4n8AUSiK103df6lYZY24ufA8jS1MIRYAzRbGwbi3d EGsHFl9ergKfkShzMRAfiZQm9q+BZSpYTrIE0CsAONz9SId5iysec6OFMUAaLji69XT8sE1 cLmBg97AZgcAZOyfBC81Q== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:79385 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> I think `skip-if' should have an ert- prefix. (I know `should' doesn't, >> but I think it, err, should as well. But too late for that one now.) > > Rather than add a prefix to `should' we could/should make it so it's > only defined within an ert-deftest (like the `go' macro in `cl-tagbody'). Yep. Will do. > Stefan Best regards, Michael.