From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13287: [PATCH] table.el: Wiki export Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 17:12:52 +1100 Message-ID: <87h9gyd4bf.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87twkyejnk.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456294473 30562 80.91.229.3 (24 Feb 2016 06:14:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 06:14:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13287@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Aaron S. Hawley" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 24 07:14:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aYSiB-0000hG-L5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 07:14:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33787 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYSiA-0006aI-Tp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 01:14:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46902) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYSi7-0006a7-5D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 01:14:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYSi2-00012K-A3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 01:14:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45201) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYSi2-00012G-6x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 01:14:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYSi2-0008SY-3g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 01:14:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 06:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13287 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 13287-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13287.145629440332464 (code B ref 13287); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 06:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13287) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2016 06:13:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42328 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYShP-0008RY-MB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 01:13:23 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:47596) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYShO-0008RQ-5h for 13287@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 01:13:22 -0500 Original-Received: from cpe-60-225-211-161.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([60.225.211.161] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aYSgz-0002pf-Vk; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 07:12:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Aaron S. Hawley's message of "Wed, 24 Feb 2016 01:09:54 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aYSgz-0002pf-Vk MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1456899178.69107@1jWv5U+dZ7Zw0wWFipNtmA X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113680 Archived-At: "Aaron S. Hawley" writes: >> This seems reasonable, but how much are the wiki and MediaWiki formats >> used as possible receptors for table.el output? I'm not sure it seems >> worth the code, but I may be totally wrong... > > I was just trying to keep table.el relevant. Of course, HTML, LaTeX > and DocBook remain so, but less and less. I'm not against the patch -- I'm just asking. :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no