From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23945: 25.1.50; Request for review: Gnus Cloud work in scratch/gnus-cloud Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:55:53 -0400 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87h9bkbh9i.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87k2gs8bak.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wpkpwrfn.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877fcjt4xf.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87r3aqcz7y.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87eg6pr8bk.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8760s1qt96.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1469019450 24460 80.91.229.3 (20 Jul 2016 12:57:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23945-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 20 14:57:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bPr3s-0006so-O1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:57:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34404 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPr3s-0003im-4W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:57:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57116) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPr3j-0003he-Au for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:57:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPr3g-0004UX-2T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:57:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45648) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPr3e-0004UK-S0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bPr3e-0007Mh-K3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:57:02 -0400 Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 23945 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 23945@debbugs.gnu.org, tzz@lifelogs.com, tzz@lifelogs.com Original-Received: via spool by 23945-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D23945.146901936628243 (code D ref 23945); Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23945-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jul 2016 12:56:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57985 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bPr2k-0007LT-0w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:56:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.220.49]:35693) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bPr2i-0007Ky-7f for 23945-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:56:04 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id iw10so18221135pac.2 for <23945-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 05:56:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lifelogs.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=japEqVlgv8wz+FhP/LB0zu9/BSAqNWGWHV82mfv9zL8=; b=Bo2njPDbtgqH27WbEaXiybRFwLWxcMt0m5QxGnNIyalYdBVJH8xYfKid5L51wYALRj cgYymTMTerp22lvwdP0tjFlYEoQselTYcSZQu3zGZKs5MCQJmaESWHmHNekDs8HaGeVK JAL1QPGjAe2kqFCdWuRtfxoWA8Jt8qqGi2HvE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references :mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=japEqVlgv8wz+FhP/LB0zu9/BSAqNWGWHV82mfv9zL8=; b=hfcoCR3j1FbrByU5yQ5S5akYPwINLy1u23VyLYRqg0qD97KNwNVNlpfj3ba1hmGh1+ QCiKu5dcunYnPstNFrISUnGouFo+82XaYm9MT5w8Pb+9vHau6MW79oup6ame6T+Ozrog 05h4LQiF61Tc/VkVfayPU0+Nja55IYPYRnAU3hl3WmlvPV9jTQU5PWstQSRPunB2wXyr qTdVdHVhJMJ8qodvHsUgOM3jdbKd2kZkCnNodeQ6dCWPm2jsADHyUp8iI0dyqkMbyK3K euH+ybtnDedNIbk2VGM1L3AnNTkeO0M82tbLw0u+s9CS1i2Bx5ItLRbzhq5Z9rjnZIRe K95A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKX6nB6mNSgmVskXa/M7D4V6gcyWVJ27Po/HuScIWNuo41OsTzKUVCSO7T0SsaY9w== X-Received: by 10.66.41.133 with SMTP id f5mr76037566pal.70.1469019358408; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 05:55:58 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from flea (c-98-229-60-157.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [98.229.60.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g27sm4742278pfd.47.2016.07.20.05.55.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Jul 2016 05:55:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: (Noam Postavsky's message of "Tue, 19 Jul 2016 21:36:12 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:121298 Archived-At: On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 21:36:12 -0400 Noam Postavsky wrote: NP> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> Let me know, based on the docs, what the commit message should say. I >> can't think of a good summary, since the work is really widespread in >> order to make this package useful. NP> Maybe something like "Bring gnus-cloud.el into working order", I NP> gather from that thread that it was broken before, right? That's still NP> not very descriptive but it looks like there's just a lot of little NP> changes that aren't really tied together. Perhaps it would be better NP> broken up into more commits (though that's probably not worth the NP> trouble at this point). All right... I squashed with the message you suggested. It's pushed so I'll call this review done. Ted