From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Thierry Volpiatto Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25482: 26.0.50; Allow setting `query-replace-from-to-separator` to nil Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 17:46:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87h94jyvx6.fsf@gmail.com> References: <871svzzcn4.fsf@gmail.com> <83lgu76nuf.fsf@gnu.org> <87vatac0a2.fsf@gmail.com> <83a8am6u6q.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3y6ezge.fsf@gmail.com> <8337gd7udo.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9z1n4o3.fsf@gmail.com> <83lgu252zc.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9yy26pg.fsf@gmail.com> <83fuka4yzj.fsf@gnu.org> <87vat65h3o.fsf@gmail.com> <87r33n3cgk.fsf@gmail.com> <83tw8jzllx.fsf@gnu.org> <87poj7wjkr.fsf@gmail.com> <83inozzbvz.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvebwhpx.fsf@gmail.com> <83h94jz42j.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485622045 2082 195.159.176.226 (28 Jan 2017 16:47:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 16:47:25 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 24.5.1 Cc: 25482@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 28 17:47:17 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXW9c-0007gR-Mg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 17:47:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52460 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXW9h-0006fv-Sr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 11:47:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44565) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXW9Z-0006fe-6i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 11:47:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXW9W-0007Yp-5Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 11:47:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51136) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXW9W-0007Yi-25 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 11:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXW9V-0003tf-RU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 11:47:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 16:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25482 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25482-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25482.148562200114951 (code B ref 25482); Sat, 28 Jan 2017 16:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25482) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jan 2017 16:46:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49335 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXW9B-0003t5-Ct for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 11:46:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:38742) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXW9A-0003st-EG for 25482@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 11:46:40 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id r126so26332968wmr.1 for <25482@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 08:46:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=hWAecNx2EADhn15v8/ZfrK3urVUiK3CP+sTcXlAnn1Y=; b=LQKi4nHFtUWnphLeXRK6MrsfUKTKeV0mwb+4vR3R2sO9ZYJ0BRU4cjY9FJauD15muH y9ZGs1KFC106kmo5msn98mvDxYi7b2+cQBHnO3vP5KSuAf/PYeZXC6Nzu86Z1qEoM5dJ 8590yEpT0gu1gaDIlSZxGts3QcVSIz7nI8YQ7IwSWHM1aIJVkt1qglL0LZNIJ1bqNQdP ly3zItkT3xbBuhOKm45MtDscnUPT80Ez1Hr7/XgPQtYNz1759jXhnNnzzDMiiffof2+D psz5BXuPo1c3Vk7dETPx8akLLMLjobqBL6eOVxoSQdb6bvKSMZ2H3kvbuzAyxXHGtC8W dfLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=hWAecNx2EADhn15v8/ZfrK3urVUiK3CP+sTcXlAnn1Y=; b=VNU1ve4+TT/nu7Q6lXIPU2wgXXzLm7v1YNto9dkKtU/rRT1+HpPuM4CvaErbkq4rEn c7TJbQOE+62GozxDU51poTyP8WzHJYicL78WrndhOWG+BLKiTdURe89aBUEZQ0HtXwsU Lj9lvrha8vvyGfMdaqBkoZqTdxraw/6+fxGivHyaty45FboXmPdPGs20fiGjH3scRGwz SX57QWMDRCkkeXdsadjcYYl+LSpyjf4iOySqQ/jHg2WMY2k2TrHr7PQAQ6T7amQfC7uv ElJZocuf3xM819DHdlGL3zGaYfkyc+DL3ke4Vn9/GDXPWD3yN3QSlUX8aFpNCW4VZnZz e1UQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLMSB4e5HNLDvB7qGTirA5j4I7W5YKV/oeZ+wvZyjSVf7nkJiaoMEVzXniar+YLKg== X-Received: by 10.28.126.11 with SMTP id z11mr7938054wmc.13.1485621994709; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 08:46:34 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from MM061 (lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net. [78.243.104.167]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g71sm9653872wmc.9.2017.01.28.08.46.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 28 Jan 2017 08:46:33 -0800 (PST) In-reply-to: <83h94jz42j.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:128725 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Thierry Volpiatto >> Cc: 25482@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 12:23:54 +0100 >> >> > Yes, the external packages need to adapt to this, if they want to use >> > the internal features. I don't think this can be avoided in general. >> >> What can be avoided is writing complex code when simple code can be used >> for the same result. > > Maybe so, but that ship has sailed more than 2 years ago, and was > preceded by a long discussion. I didn't read all of it now, but > AFAIU, the reason for using a character with a display property was to > make the separator not editable when the user edits the history. Ok, I understand, don't think many people are editing history file and people doing so, I guess known what they are doing. > So that design decision and the resulting code we have now had some > justification, and any replacement will have to support the same > features, which I think a simple string will not do. Ok, thanks for explanation, perhaps you can close this bug. -- Thierry