From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31783: [PATCH v2] ido.el: define a special ido-fallback variable Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:34:10 -0400 Message-ID: <87h8lvr75p.fsf@gmail.com> References: <83bmcktpef.fsf@gnu.org> <20180611082340.28727-1-junke.christophe@gmail.com> <87efhdzfbc.fsf@gmail.com> <83h8m9qr5e.fsf@gnu.org> <837en5qn3l.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1529627594 31166 195.159.176.226 (22 Jun 2018 00:33:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 00:33:14 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: Christophe Junke , 31783@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 22 02:33:09 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fWA0j-000819-Am for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 02:33:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58133 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fWA2o-0002SK-Pu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:35:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58148) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fWA2d-0002RX-AL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:35:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fWA2Y-0004Tr-CI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51634) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fWA2Y-0004Th-8d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fWA2Y-0000S9-3D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 00:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31783 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 31783-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31783.15296276591680 (code B ref 31783); Fri, 22 Jun 2018 00:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31783) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2018 00:34:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59531 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fWA1r-0000R2-5K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:34:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f42.google.com ([209.85.214.42]:38949) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fWA1p-0000Qo-Dq for 31783@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:34:17 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f42.google.com with SMTP id p185-v6so585844itp.4 for <31783@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:34:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=MvwKEt/e0wBuwpt0P6eQ4taJh+raYXUrJn29DHmln4U=; b=BGEmW7hvRHbnyvlJs7PjxYaz4YXIa3g1qxBUBZsRgElGkqqsDitoUt+fnVCh6eokIt tiUP/Mrabs83Pk0pxSA0lZkgvpMnjZzEJxwip9vU+qjJhxUEstGcsd5sGtLLO2V8DQgl xtzG8UZIfuA5kHfiMqNvod1FmJkiOnagR3zPk+Lx9UB3ZPxJkqiLpBAsTkRi9lNsatlk mqL+vSvkqGzHKtO1rjozgI2/w90IiPTQ31P5Qc1pJ9IgX8DZEAhSkLOxW/Vhbs63eGy5 cDc5jaMhY9Bh7k7h54fon1hiss0tQRXZ28Iy9lfYFcogs+J4QP2aAJ96ahufPacz9rN7 /9zQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=MvwKEt/e0wBuwpt0P6eQ4taJh+raYXUrJn29DHmln4U=; b=idsPtkVD10V22a6pROelrpcQjQSLI3RD7uJDCFCNCF5mKSS105UET5Q+EuhIudqsuw EpYjUZNt58BQx/49fiqLRbpM9C6Is97pp9Mx2etnHC8leudHD0e1Zj1rdxXd3bpmaW4L Bk3/IROSS4NAEueSBO1SmYjfZloJhPxX2kQyj3XQJFwKicdnGsoy3uBV9HkVaK4CFx6/ /9nuUnmBSNWpg/+CkNId4gGQu9Q/Npkc3N5Qwjs5ZEtL3STnwB+FkaYUWt5IUk6EDOsK vGYOk9c79udB+OkBuwPPAqHfASniiTmZwi6AhMgHbvCXLWAEkpdiBF7vi9FStluA1koC 5rjw== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1St83mZQTU/XsNaMfyVCa+ZJlUq8yrzc7w0yKPPQbxHSzbzNQ9 tm8fQju+GLhZkSF88R0c0PtYmA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIb0oCx6f6QVuWq/3S4+fd4TjtZlUBDh8LAkU1wcOveSLGMRE5tCZTdBZFRrT0+W0a7LH88sA== X-Received: by 2002:a24:19c2:: with SMTP id b185-v6mr7104244itb.147.1529627651883; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:34:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z70-v6sm233245itb.14.2018.06.21.17.34.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:34:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <837en5qn3l.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 11 Jun 2018 19:55:42 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:147719 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Christophe Junke >> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 18:16:07 +0200 >> >> With respect to naming: my possibly wrong understanding of >> Emacs Lisp coding conventions is that special variables should be >> prefixed by the package's name, and that's why I (re)named >> the variable ido-fallback in both patches. >> >> Also, here is a summary of the original problem, as I see it. > > Ah, okay. Thanks for explaining this, I agree that your original > change was TRT. So should this go to emacs-26? It's introducing a new feature, but that makes up for a semi-accidental feature that was lost. And what's the copyright situation?