From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31968: 26.1.50; Allow to hide title bar on maximize (gtk/gnome/csd) Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 22:03:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87h8lhcsn1.fsf@gmail.com> References: <877emm1trq.fsf@gmail.com> <87fu18pmo7.fsf@gmail.com> <5B349617.3010102@gmx.at> <878t6zaq66.fsf@gmail.com> <5B35F0ED.3070409@gmx.at> <874lhmasho.fsf@gmail.com> <5B374075.50300@gmx.at> <5B389924.5040104@gmx.at> <87r2klepnl.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1530561735 3326 195.159.176.226 (2 Jul 2018 20:02:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 20:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 31968@debbugs.gnu.org, Jonathan Kyle Mitchell To: Carlos Pita Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 02 22:02:11 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fa51V-0000ig-Au for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 22:02:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35170 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fa53a-0000NO-Q0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 16:04:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49570) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fa53P-0000LC-0u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 16:04:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fa53L-0002ly-Fg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 16:04:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36047) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fa53L-0002lu-9g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 16:04:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fa53L-0006XX-0M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 16:04:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 20:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31968 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31968-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31968.153056180425059 (code B ref 31968); Mon, 02 Jul 2018 20:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31968) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2018 20:03:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43939 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fa52h-0006W6-J8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 16:03:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:52781) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fa52f-0006Vr-Tv for 31968@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 16:03:22 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id w16-v6so6161wmc.2 for <31968@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 13:03:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list :date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vkEh7B+DmrjmCm8D9WiK3+4s04nMmQdP3aKeUmQqeXk=; b=gfKwKAnOgHaCdOhjzhCFgRR18WB2Zfy1uCBeoue2BCAxk5Ba/I6EamaTXODPB5ClBJ lQDahL2NvZcejYZ59OBI6hVhZnJmSfv749rKByMQkj8/1uSqbxOYJ+NEJtpVbRqNrtx0 mVzbj+Uzbif7FxbdR640BlqntkiA5UYYwJHCQj+4USkgLa3zzGEtb6ZLdR6JIA+ay51r 5whxnKpHKAikounIbjvx2YebHAvpWpq3ZWeH5HVicRJhyaqRv9OX0epx011qo9ULNGW0 j9icToVWlCp3pI3UjtrcMeLQuVDR0e0v1Bm/gw1HmANfHJyPgdtecD1xwTdULQTYnF2u ZGMQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vkEh7B+DmrjmCm8D9WiK3+4s04nMmQdP3aKeUmQqeXk=; b=A95oUv16u+IHHJ/wkAOfAdF0AmHTMEEOezAtntDvhsbcD7IUGEU+wwCT/7+9nGK4YN vackPRS4mCP2EUo8sDe3WI2vB88pcOccSljJpSXgSnc0o6e2mfXrvuh+7igw8eg0Ce/M 8HKz1ysMEUrpdBrq0igMDPNy9Wrn+N+RCy+C8EPvv0tweKywDlrLpGZmaVSoZakXFk1S iYuNn64SO04x56t3xs6+xxPs5xPMjc+uk99gq1boFUWw/7huqYHFCzk55WcBEWIR4Tk0 QAgH5rqvtQVL+FMe4Tr9DMIL3RN72YmRPEYcoRWQLELCJWtwGM253LCdYtYLGhgVkxDD lM5g== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3432RkQBqlxwG3fm0yAKTIqPSz5Ip8H+L4YUNUCRMdPdcqftnx xkFDTsFiEHpPvPHt+IYEmh4B9LoPBzA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfc5lJSqRInafIIeUsOlO9HCLumTna5ODdW9r9BVpgu68nrjz1jCT3TZ8q6NMJM22Zod5bDeA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:570a:: with SMTP id l10-v6mr3094514wmb.56.1530561796228; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 13:03:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim-ubuntu (vav06-1-78-207-202-134.fbx.proxad.net. [78.207.202.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j131-v6sm9702529wmb.25.2018.07.02.13.03.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Jul 2018 13:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: (Carlos Pita's message of "Mon, 2 Jul 2018 14:44:58 -0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:148123 Archived-At: Carlos Pita writes: > One more thing to take into account: after decorations are removed by > the WM because of _GTK_HIDE_TITLEBAR_WHEN_MAXIMIZED the undecorated > property is still nil in the frame alist. Maybe it's better for this > to be so, but I'm not so sure, after all the WM did remove the > decorations. You=CA=BCre confusing a proof-of-concept patch with a final implementation :-) Actually, if _GTK_HIDE_TITLEBAR_WHEN_MAXIMIZED and '(undecorated t) result in the same visuals, why don=CA=BCt we do the latter when we maximize a frame (with a variable to control it of course). Does that not avoid more of the differences between window managers? Robert