From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
To: Reuben Thomas <rrt@sc3d.org>
Cc: 11944@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#11944: 24.1.50; newcomment needs comment-normalize-vars in more functions
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 14:50:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h86flawk.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fw8txj8e.fsf@sc3d.org> (Reuben Thomas's message of "Sun, 15 Jul 2012 14:10:57 +0100")
Reuben Thomas <rrt@sc3d.org> writes:
> When adding a word to a per-buffer dictionary in an AuCTeX buffer, I get
> an error caused by the fact that AuCTeX sets comment-padding to 1, then
> calls comment-padright, which assumes comment-padding is a string.
>
> A similar bug report is here:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-auctex/2011-12/msg00000.html
>
> Making comment-padright call comment-normalize-vars fixes this problem;
> presumably at least comment-padleft and perhaps other functions need the
> same treatment.
>
> (As far as I can see, setting comment-padding to an integer is still
> allowed, as per its docstring.)
(I'm going through old bug reports that have unfortunately gotten no
responses yet.)
The doc in newcomment.el specifies that any command that calls the
newcomment functions should call `comment-normalize-vars' first, so I
don't think this is a bug in newcomment.el. (All the commands in that
file do this.)
So this sounds like a bug in AuCTeX. Are you still seeing this bug, and
if so, do you have a backtrace that'll show where AuCTeX is bugging out?
The referenced URL is just somebody calling `commend-padright' directly,
which isn't allowed.
(I'll add that to the doc string of that function.)
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-17 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-15 13:10 bug#11944: 24.1.50; newcomment needs comment-normalize-vars in more functions Reuben Thomas
2019-08-17 21:50 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen [this message]
2019-08-18 9:52 ` Reuben Thomas via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2019-08-18 17:22 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h86flawk.fsf@mouse.gnus.org \
--to=larsi@gnus.org \
--cc=11944@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=rrt@sc3d.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).