From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38035: 27.0.50; Trivial errors in process filters can render Emacs unusable Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 21:34:38 +0100 Message-ID: <87h83czt41.fsf@gnus.org> References: <874kzmdv0q.fsf@gnus.org> <83ftj5hsal.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfswap7q.fsf@gnus.org> <83d0e8j3it.fsf@gnu.org> <87eeyi5cck.fsf@gnus.org> <831ruiay99.fsf@gnu.org> <871rui5bry.fsf@gnus.org> <83zhh5a7pa.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="145749"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 38035@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 09 21:35:25 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iTXS8-000blw-KY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 21:35:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39712 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTXS7-0002iB-9E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 15:35:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49602) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTXRo-0002i0-Sp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 15:35:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTXRn-0002lY-7L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 15:35:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTXRm-0002kv-Gd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 15:35:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iTXRm-0005JX-9J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 15:35:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 20:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38035 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38035-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38035.157333168520398 (code B ref 38035); Sat, 09 Nov 2019 20:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38035) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Nov 2019 20:34:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50338 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iTXRU-0005Iu-Lj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 15:34:44 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:40912) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iTXRT-0005Im-2e for 38035@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 15:34:43 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iTXRP-0000sQ-1n; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 21:34:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83zhh5a7pa.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 09 Nov 2019 08:24:01 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:171356 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Maybe we should do the same with timer functions, indeed. And post-command-hook and all the other errors? >> I just think that Emacs should behave consistently. > > If doing the same with timers will contribute to that consistency, I > don't object. I just think that we shouldn't remove an old feature > because of a single accident that should be quite rare. What do you mean by "single accident"? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no