From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Markus Triska Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35005: 27.0.50; Fontification unexpectedly works with anonymous faces Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 22:29:10 +0100 Message-ID: <87h83cu4bd.fsf__30973.2083509274$1573335019$gmane$org@metalevel.at> References: <83r2arj7rv.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8xw6d61.fsf@gnus.org> <871rur4u4j.fsf@gnus.org> <87sgn6abjw.fsf@metalevel.at> <87mudee2pk.fsf@gnus.org> <87y2wpndxs.fsf@metalevel.at> <87tv7czulh.fsf@gnus.org> <87imnszrsx.fsf@metalevel.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="96132"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Emacs/26.1 Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 35005@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 09 22:30:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iTYJB-000Osy-HT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 22:30:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39926 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTYJA-0007l2-6D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 16:30:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56158) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTYJ2-0007iA-4f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 16:30:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTYJ1-0002qt-A7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 16:30:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41548) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTYJ1-0002qM-7e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 16:30:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iTYJ1-0006zp-0s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 16:30:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Markus Triska Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 21:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35005 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 35005-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35005.157333495626808 (code B ref 35005); Sat, 09 Nov 2019 21:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35005) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Nov 2019 21:29:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50369 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iTYIF-0006yK-ST for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 16:29:16 -0500 Original-Received: from metalevel.at ([185.194.236.120]:43168) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iTYIE-0006y8-0T for 35005@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 16:29:14 -0500 Original-Received: by metalevel.at (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A5E1D727AD; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 22:29:10 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 09 Nov 2019 16:10:58 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:171359 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Maybe we should simply better document the general rules about where > anonymous faces can usually be used and where they usually can't be > used Yes, I would greatly appreciate this, and it would also solve this concrete issue. Thank you and all the best, Markus