From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38497: 27.0.50; Frame is not rendered when frame-resize-pixelwise it 't Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2019 17:24:15 +0800 Message-ID: <87h82bb268.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <87wobbjlm0.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <7caf72bb-1dc0-6e6d-430a-5c28295fb80c@gmx.at> <87tv6fjco6.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20b3b02b-8018-49cd-4ab3-702ccf9e1c28@gmx.at> <87d0d0i7hk.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <25861c90-bdb5-e873-7da7-22a8d997f4b6@gmx.at> <871rtghy2v.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <2975a018-4c5c-4da4-f236-8eb4338a9829@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="240491"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" To: martin rudalics , 38497@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 08 10:27:17 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1idsqT-0010SE-2D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2019 10:27:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57176 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1idsqR-0003ci-Uk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2019 04:27:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51600) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1idsqF-0003cU-LY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2019 04:27:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1idsqE-0005qy-Fx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2019 04:27:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44518) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1idsqE-0005pw-A2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2019 04:27:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1idsqE-0003CF-6r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2019 04:27:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ihor Radchenko Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2019 09:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38497 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38497-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38497.157579717312229 (code B ref 38497); Sun, 08 Dec 2019 09:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38497) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2019 09:26:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50491 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1idspR-0003BB-J1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2019 04:26:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yw1-f49.google.com ([209.85.161.49]:44791) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1idspQ-0003Ay-KC for 38497@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2019 04:26:12 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-yw1-f49.google.com with SMTP id t141so4618196ywc.11 for <38497@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 08 Dec 2019 01:26:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=g7rlYMTWfmHaXcWHJQ/7wufkPZi/mN5gMyywIvdL6kQ=; b=b69QiUUHkGYxRdCK7T99H361KmfFw3wVPbSGN/vhQuQVa1x5TrcCEEOeO+ucRkmgIW q8Hqy+ID3mZgLm74rWW4BoUCatqd86LcL3yuO5Hqr7mOErwLLeCT36/5+OYjo0dNwPSl iJBtQeiNgfNnuMUOFqJKp1APPbC3Mann6LuzYAybPU2lS6tLbj+NcgicAX7OMgrC0xfr wNKbjPdi67ZOR9/EzcOD8Rc/0e+Pi3fYLRycHGTAfwX95xmqnH6iVk4Gfu/quqO3Gi4O CLQjfXm5KLUCpJgviG9raR92aWNmUDdbji2FY/Ais57rVdNe9WzIBD00rwRVyMzx51Tv xgxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=g7rlYMTWfmHaXcWHJQ/7wufkPZi/mN5gMyywIvdL6kQ=; b=mOrNZ3QFgTBWOmmOAcGV+D4bOTz82GRtke2R18bPuicKQ3d906I0/OEhDKXD10ns2O 8c2xwG7Qqq4mzdzUgKV0azLw/wBOy6J9eTR/oXYI2/4nie9g+GXHpOLx7YhLmmLHUjJi atSfrVvO0iIGRkQA5V9V6aomxgNxOJAs75+ODVGWM2+9bBzClg9j5fjfzRm6N61XvHEk gxkK0VS7fq6XbpB7G46b6JxPZQeeQ3LgKnMMMoKqdlJbygueQXVGoxM0C84llfavcgJh lJ/NknVs4CWdnK0rHkZ5N2hUOSIVQxN2hFRLRXUPctXxRZitdPZQjyn9xEec4HI/Epg7 yhSg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU6FPCMDwmx+lMn/zIUCmE2KsC4QMNZ9LLmMjWIrtLO3lv6HioD h1wAQ84iGQqCZgi4yTo4afY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxf29bLlUivf1dEvLvfgC8ld8eN5ZTK1tAeRz88lCozgXh1xzXVjjhvJ+TBJXd3HCFxEkKuHg== X-Received: by 2002:a81:6b07:: with SMTP id g7mr17490856ywc.139.1575797167059; Sun, 08 Dec 2019 01:26:07 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([5.226.137.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6sm8647703ywu.28.2019.12.08.01.26.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 08 Dec 2019 01:26:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2975a018-4c5c-4da4-f236-8eb4338a9829@gmx.at> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:173050 Archived-At: > Then could you please try to bisect your build options so we can find out > which one is responsible? Will try to do that. Though it will take a while since I use the Gentoo package manager to tweak the build options for now (which means that every compilation is being done from scratch). I will send an update once I finish. Regards, Ihor martin rudalics writes: > >> Is it a good idea to build with xft _and_ cairo? And what's bad > >> about libotf? > > > > xft+cairo is just an artefact from my past experiments with build > > options. > > libotf is disabled by default in gentoo (as a dependence of m17lib > > support, which is also disabled). > > Then could you please try to bisect your build options so we can find out > which one is responsible? > > martin