From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41373: GNU ELPA: Add "reporting bugs" to individual package pages Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 08:32:24 +0200 Organization: GNU Message-ID: <87h7vvjnyf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87imgr9nr3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r1v85qs3.fsf@gnu.org> <87imgkt469.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="22080"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 41373@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Kangas , Richard Stallman , dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 01 08:33:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jfe0V-0005cg-Lo for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 08:33:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54400 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfe0U-0006XD-O8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 02:33:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41050) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfe0M-0006WY-QW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 02:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51048) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfe0M-000316-Hv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 02:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jfe0M-0004tG-FM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 02:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Bastien Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 06:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41373 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41373-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41373.159099316118772 (code B ref 41373); Mon, 01 Jun 2020 06:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41373) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jun 2020 06:32:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34361 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jfe01-0004sh-LM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 02:32:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33594) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jfe00-0004sU-4p for 41373@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 02:32:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42264) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfdzu-0002yP-56; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 02:32:34 -0400 Original-Received: from lns-bzn-32-82-254-31-120.adsl.proxad.net ([82.254.31.120]:44904 helo=guerry) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jfdzm-0007bE-W4; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 02:32:27 -0400 Original-Received: by guerry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ADA251A603C1; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 08:32:24 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87imgkt469.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Mon, 25 May 2020 08:39:10 -0700") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:181326 Archived-At: Hi Eric, Eric Abrahamsen writes: > I think in the original discussion the patch went back and forth between > completing on `package-alist' and completing on `features'. The former > didn't offer enough, the latter offered too much. While not offering "enough", the former is already an improvement, I'd be in favor of implementing it. The latter really offers too much IMO. > If we complete on `features', that's definitely an issue. I think my > solution in that version of the patch simply dropped the issue if the > Maintainer header was emacs-devel, or there was no Maintainer. Yes, it looks fine to me like this. > My pleasure -- as Dmitry notes, this might not solve the problem that > this thread is about, but I think it's definitely worthwhile on its own. Definitely. What is still needed here so that you can make this change? -- Bastien