From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43716: 28.0.50; Error with emacsclient : Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 16:07:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87h7rf5pf9.fsf@gnus.org> References: <874knfeofw.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8ln76y0.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1qjv01q.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20466"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 43716@debbugs.gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 30 16:08:18 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kNcmI-0005EP-O4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 16:08:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53536 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNcmH-0002eV-QP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:08:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45944) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNcm2-0002d7-VV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49106) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNcm2-0008I7-Lc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kNcm2-0003Ox-GT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:08:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43716 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43716-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43716.160147483813022 (code B ref 43716); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43716) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Sep 2020 14:07:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60652 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kNclK-0003Ny-DA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:07:18 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:45604) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kNclI-0003Nk-Aq for 43716@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:07:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/w4qXl8rKjJdZKoeIA9ZffAS2gWNAGDToOE+GCwZGgU=; b=h/m43SAy+AbBfonCmwejusUNVr Xi7uv9hDs3VyeeAKAmJqkBvH61inV5Mh5jcYxcrQ7oVU/rXVeLvyte/2PxrLCbTtopPAuwe1W0uTD WwSBdEfM67PH0YHoos83vS4oGKP/0unbT1GA++4OHlt6JTiPG/978E91TEYo5oolN7/c=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kNcl9-0002DV-GU; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 16:07:10 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAElBMVEW5qZqZhneJdmpp WFNALi////9+s8bRAAAAAWJLR0QF+G/pxwAAAAd0SU1FB+QJHg0eOAhMpfsAAAGnSURBVDjLnVPZ keUgDISJAOklsBKbAIgM7Pxj2pY47Kmp/Rk+qDItdetop/S7Q/RfJO6cC1FJ5QXk+GBpHlE4l0NF cTellIWUTxIJIK7WqXYjyosHCQJutnnkKUURSmQ2Lrvv2/rRz9YRibd7+NWOeO7CE/Bz0Xxn7Wrq wLXeA2B1OdV6EhoAIJnxJi68gb4GhGK5n3AwyRYOsnsnWNtdEIAn/jZdNSXK8vCDyerMyVT4AJdX bEarjXESbNj9GtbD5CNUH9skeykAgMQCvuzF1eroUmZhX0/XVxdxCQdK/rxqbQygxdowkNo/YzMx O8BSEvI+/fO0h5VBHQAT1Wvs/jC0XhvGUZKCagHLC9bCZ0pax6ZxO9T+B4Ak66qLaaA7ACQ+wQS1 OhNmhqHGcDmi6qnI4hbfarJ6fLPF3ZTiVPo0AaooKqg6vQCcDhs0z9hUV/jUA9lX5RvYGnXb3YJK eEw721HvEK8t899nhqHzaYyM8bjK5m69UEsvr003WtSg34BTc9WfQMxXAYwfCULhn2++jS6lZHfJ EQ0aANvtdmYyFyLrf/oHnU2yT1gOCNUAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMjAtMDktMzBUMTM6 MzA6NTUrMDA6MDAiumrRAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIwLTA5LTMwVDEzOjMwOjU1KzAw OjAwU+fSbQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: So's _So_: "j" In-Reply-To: <87r1qjv01q.fsf@gnu.org> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:58:25 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:189338 Archived-At: Tassilo Horn writes: > I cannot reproduce the issue with "emacs -Q", though, so it's most > probably something with my configuration or some 3rd party package. If > I'd know the function call site or at least what function's called with > too many args, I'd probably figure out what's the problem. It's unfortunate that there's no way to get Emacs to reliably give a backtrace -- I'm guessing there's a condition-case somewhere in the server code that inhibits the debugging? Does (setq debug-ignored-errors nil debug-on-error t) help with getting a backtrace? (It's a long shot...) (setq debug-on-message "arguments") may allow the backtrace to appear in some circumstances. > Starting program: /home/horn/Repos/el/emacs/lib-src/emacsclient ~/tmp/test.aux > Waiting for Emacs... > *ERROR*: Wrong number of arguments: (1 . 4), 5 I grepped for the string "*ERROR*" in the Emacs source tree, and couldn't find it, but perhaps it's composed differently. > [Inferior 1 (process 23487) exited with code 01] > (gdb) bt > No stack. > > Any help? My GDB foo is quite low but I can operate it when given > instructions. Setting a breakpoint on Fsignal could perhaps work? My gdb-foo is low, too, though. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no