From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46240: Sorting order of read-char-by-name Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:19:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87h7mrq002.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87v9bb4tm2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83wnvr65zg.fsf@gnu.org> <875z3aooao.fsf@gnus.org> <87lfc666vr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87tuqti2kw.fsf@gnus.org> <87bld1hvwg.fsf@gnus.org> <87zh0lq6n8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87lfc4gtam.fsf@gnus.org> <87zh0kw4n1.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25021"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 46240@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 04 17:38:19 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7he7-0006Qz-RD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:38:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58610 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7he6-0005zA-R1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:38:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34128) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7hMQ-0004bM-W2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:20:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58792) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7hMQ-0003cz-P5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:20:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7hMQ-00069C-J9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:20:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 16:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46240 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 46240-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46240.161245556323578 (code B ref 46240); Thu, 04 Feb 2021 16:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46240) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2021 16:19:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42105 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7hLm-00068E-Mh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:19:22 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:59072) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7hLl-000680-0Z for 46240@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:19:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=waVGNBwa8cfNrNz8tcN29Vir6MYGO60AEPcvW/P1acA=; b=J7wgF3tw2bQj1x/ioW5LaYvxYI cZqhi+bOhX+lS2KXtiH3+6CxoRwk/1Isb7C6NYfMe5jAXP78aTY78ezRO2C9vt8g8maEvWL0BdVhV vSCYHiUtnoWs8SmrBeiQV7Gz6KjNr4qsatePz6gfvTNwyN69TOKsA8lYvq6c1eQD1iuI=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7hLb-0000gq-5K; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:19:14 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAElBMVEUKCAYtJx9fWEqK gHKzp5v////iIdWkAAAAAWJLR0QF+G/pxwAAAAd0SU1FB+UCBBAMO35n4f4AAAGhSURBVDjLlVOB kdwwCAQnBQBuwEIpICe5gf9T/zVlkeSzLslnJjvjmzMLywojItaBXEvSC0JA/PFkVtzBxKtoxMmY xIq61woKAVbvFYYnF0gFCgrM6wFatiQW6QOl/0QFm4tafcPRe6gTJ1SUfMXPQRCHk+g89c72GHGD 3ThGRk17nrU1GRV2sNvM7fikSaSUDzRoF+qoYPZQOdtNTFe0v0Qm8XO6qosM8NRpl1Z9hJUu7KvS B93gtQDv2yVF25uSmrxKUjrbs/lZ+2c8aOmC0IMjByM7LJfr8DB26H7iQ8newstVIs5CmlsrMhre alaLy/6sic5JzJVwz/XB8Vm3/OxEbxlNkEya/KBNvGeHeHwmi90RjgDtrw7HJjiO8Dwcj1+l79hD x56xy+0Hu0Vb4b6xnGipAL7NxPeKNcPeCf4t7ybsr1GZS9HvyiKs97AADc+aF4J/BFEwDU68LwSR D2BEcZuEtc8LjxluE7SUeZWCNfMMOdxN9gjrZcEZlxclqiAwojEeuMkwy90w39vIKn8OqhfoZL8G /4Pkr0ml/8YvoI5XsdQ7Bh8AAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMjEtMDItMDRUMTY6MTI6NTkr MDA6MDCe2DKlAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIxLTAyLTA0VDE2OjEyOjU5KzAwOjAw74WK GQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Normil Hawaiians's _What's Going On?_: "Market Place" In-Reply-To: <87zh0kw4n1.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:32:27 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:199309 Archived-At: Juri Linkov writes: > Oops, I noticed that my previous implementation sorted by names > inside each block, not by code. I'm not sure if this makes sense? > Definitely, sorting by code inside blocks should be implemented > as the primary feature, but should an additional option with previous > implementation be retained to sort inside blocks by names too? Having the option to sort by names within each block sounds nice to me. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no