From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51733: 27.1; Detect impossible email addresses better Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:54:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87h79zdgxe.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87czn8etuz.7.fsf@jidanni.org> <49EACC4C-E21E-4123-A3D2-901958CF7DC4@gnu.org> <87mtju76pp.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl0awbqq.fsf@gnu.org> <87sftm5lxc.fsf@gnus.org> <835yqiwa87.fsf@gnu.org> <87ee565l4d.fsf@gnus.org> <875yqi5kk7.fsf@gnus.org> <83zgnuuucu.fsf@gnu.org> <83r196uqni.fsf@gnu.org> <87sftm3ye5.fsf@gnus.org> <87iluh4ety.fsf@gnus.org> <87ee55474p.fsf@gnus.org> <87a6ft46mr.fsf@gnus.org> <874k6146ay.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgnt2qz9.fsf@gnus.org> <87v8yh2ot4.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1952omd.fsf@gnus.org> <831r14vq70.fsf@gnu.org> <8735lkdqll.fsf@gnus.org> <834k60t03u.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29260"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 51733@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 19 14:23:16 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nAAvk-0007QF-4G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 14:23:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35260 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAAvi-0003fb-Ck for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:23:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49750) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAAUe-0006Vz-20 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 07:55:17 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59679) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAAUP-0000eH-OG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 07:55:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nAAUP-0006Vq-Nf; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 07:55:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 12:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51733 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus Original-Received: via spool by 51733-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51733.164259689525011 (code B ref 51733); Wed, 19 Jan 2022 12:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51733) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jan 2022 12:54:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52581 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nAAUI-0006VJ-IZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 07:54:54 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:34350) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nAAUF-0006V4-J6 for 51733@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 07:54:53 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=k5ifBAp/onxyJFwJ4D85TFVMFXG/FGyynuGK6dTKzzQ=; b=sGaTSmmqqo5W/ZA9qcOUAJA69k 9cojFMmqAv8JbJkgxSZLKNk+1BJHc+97mfCNmO6opCmBwM/Gna+pWeWFw7BIO2MAiPV/N5VBws/UW mTbIUu/+8LdcKK2OuyTIIxp8XtjFcYHtW/cWooAQCwXfFXMs3Wgg7IvDkjtsVAppK9mU=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nAAU6-0002oW-5Z; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:54:44 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAElBMVEUQFBg5TF1VcZBv hp3Bwr////9uWi7SAAAAAWJLR0QF+G/pxwAAAAd0SU1FB+YBEwwzCfeopw4AAAGySURBVDjLdZMB muIwCIVh9gJA9wCFeIBJ4gXcnfufaR9J1GrdWLVf/vIID0pESh8XqwquM9CxhM8RkhH4+0/EWUzd wgLsQ3JTE/qQX8hpPwM8y2r+ITvSI4eQTGF7O5ev+5g3eFABnKuNEs3DEY8FzuxKhgMIcXhIxidg 6NL3l6R2An2CPBZPH49AOYEOkOoj94yQuxucWVWZeSRHjlVbrFXGqeC4z+osDstXNbKE/BVwgohz RIIXoZhpE3B72Z59w49sh+0sbQBHxFAqvcWO6XgAkgFKd9TEonepWAAuk4o++5Ngm4MyXMuOZBcg RYLqk+TMRMNntMfXOE7DW+mQraOfAEMjSuvROlaro20ISol+WHW0jXi3UvobQITwftymCTBKxvtz uy2ArG6uT/C97QPoG7jeSjrq94iZA4VdbigzTTRtCXBJvlby+1aGMQBR8epIvgfohF7+2gH4fDty 7H5+ZAKkSKnpU1i7Avzq8CojDPlLSZeiX/4QQHuAVXnguERb1mHmFd8NXk9QhbbSskCrcGVLL3ov /SoAfQCtqjt7DgMiGtED4LA5u/yYgi9Y8g/BjluI0nu+VwAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAy Mi0wMS0xOVQxMjo1MTowOSswMDowMFmtPCUAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjItMDEtMTlU MTI6NTE6MDkrMDA6MDAo8ISZAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Depeche Mode's _Some Great Reward_: "Master And Servant" In-Reply-To: <834k60t03u.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:51:17 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:224568 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > This is unfortunate. It means, for example, that a simple lazy > discovery of suspicious addresses by scanning the email reading buffer > with regular expressions will not work, and the feature must instead > scan the original mbox buffer. There's no scanning -- rmail displays the From header, right? So it does decoding before displaying the header. It has to do the textsec stuff first, too. > Why cannot we lift this restriction? mail-header-parse-address is not > the only way to parse email addresses. Or maybe we could encode the > email address if the original one causes an error? There is no reliable way to parse a decoded mail address, and since this is a security thing, we don't want to do DWIM and guesses (which is what you have to do when composing a valid email address from a string like "F=C3=B3o, Jr. "). --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no