From: "Kévin Le Gouguec" <kevin.legouguec@gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: 55027@debbugs.gnu.org, Howard Melman <hmelman@gmail.com>
Subject: bug#55027: 28.1; User option python-forward-sexp-function in wrong group
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 20:09:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h76mgvgh.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83tuamr4fy.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 21 Apr 2022 15:44:49 +0300")
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> Since it's a new option, you're just extending the amount of time
>> for people to get confused by it.
>
> Confused in what way? How can the fact that an option appears in an
> additional customization group confuse someone?
FWIW: we already have two users (Howard and myself) who raised an
eyebrow seeing this option in python-flymake, and took the time to write
a bug report about it.
It's not entirely unlikely that more Emacs 28 users will happen to see
this option in that group while perusing the python-flymake group, raise
an eyebrow, and write a report. Even assuming they use 28.2, they might
not think to check that it is also present in the "python" group, and
might do as we did and assume it's a mistake.
And even if they see that the option is also in the "python" group, they
might not look further than "well that's silly, it shouldn't belong in
python-flymake, let's report this". I wouldn't fault them for that.
I don't mind your solution and don't want to waste anyone's time with
this; I just saw your question and took the bait, since those
hypothetical scenarios I describe sound more likely to me than the one
you have in mind (IIUC: a user being {accustomed to,fine with,not
confused by} this new option being in the python-flymake group).
Please dismiss if you're not convinced.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-21 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-19 21:27 bug#55027: 28.1; User option python-forward-sexp-function in wrong group Howard Melman
2022-04-20 5:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-04-20 6:31 ` Kévin Le Gouguec
2022-04-20 13:50 ` Howard Melman
2022-04-20 19:55 ` Kévin Le Gouguec
2022-04-21 6:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-04-21 12:06 ` Howard Melman
2022-04-21 12:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-04-21 14:33 ` Howard Melman
2022-04-21 15:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-04-21 15:46 ` Howard Melman
2022-04-21 18:09 ` Kévin Le Gouguec [this message]
2022-04-21 18:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h76mgvgh.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=kevin.legouguec@gmail.com \
--cc=55027@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=hmelman@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).