bug#59137: [PATCH] To minor changes related to overlays

[Matt Armstrong <matt@rfc20.org>]

Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:

> Matt Armstrong <matt@rfc20.org> writes:
>
>> Attached is the rebased patch for the new helper function (it didn't
>> change much if at all).  As Stefan suggested, the patch for the iterator
>> is no longer relevant.
>
> Thanks.
>
>> From 3e2c4cd143d51c66198dd606e18015eeae42f3ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Matt Armstrong <matt@rfc20.org>
>> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 15:00:18 -0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] Add itree_empty_p for clarity and reduced coupling
>>
>> * src/itree.h (itree_empty_p): New predicate.
>> * src/buffer.h (buffer_has_overlays): Call it.
>> * src/pdumper.c (dump_buffer): ditto.
>> * src/alloc.c (mark_buffer): ditto.

Thanks for the tips.


> Equivalently, you can leave out "ditto" so the above is just the below
> (I added the bug number too, according to our conventions):
>
> * src/itree.h (itree_empty_p): New predicate.
> * src/buffer.h (buffer_has_overlays):
> * src/pdumper.c (dump_buffer):
> * src/alloc.c (mark_buffer): Call it.  (Bug#59137)
>
>> ---
>>  src/alloc.c   | 2 +-
>>  src/buffer.h  | 3 +--
>>  src/itree.h   | 9 +++++++++
>>  src/pdumper.c | 2 +-
>>  4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/alloc.c b/src/alloc.c
>> index 0653f2e0cc..526a25393f 100644
>> --- a/src/alloc.c
>> +++ b/src/alloc.c
>> @@ -6553,7 +6553,7 @@ mark_buffer (struct buffer *buffer)
>>    if (!BUFFER_LIVE_P (buffer))
>>        mark_object (BVAR (buffer, undo_list));
>>
>> -  if (buffer->overlays)
>> +  if (!itree_empty_p (buffer->overlays))
>>      mark_overlays (buffer->overlays->root);
>
> I'm not familiar with this code at all, but I note that the condition
> here changes from:
>
>     buffer->overlays
>
> to
>
>     buffer->overlays && buffer->overlays->root
>
> Is that correct?  Unless I missed something, the patch description
> doesn't say anything about it.

The admittedly redundant NULL check done by itree_empty_p does not
change semantics or cause harm.  mark_overlays in alloc.c is a recursive
function so it handles NULL itself, hence the NULL check was omitted in
the original code.