From: Jens Schmidt via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 66032@debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com
Subject: bug#66032: [PATCH] Inline advice documentation into advised function's docstring, after all
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 23:03:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h6nr19f3.fsf@sappc2.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvzg1kpnq1.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 17 Sep 2023 16:13:16 -0400")
[Sorry if this is resent - thought I sent it yesterday already.]
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> [...]
Thanks for your comments again, I'll consider them.
>> Do you think this docstring generation should be covered by ERT tests?
>
> ERT tests are always welcome,
I have been trying to understand these quirks and previous bugs of
functions `advice--make-single-doc' and `advice--make-docstring' better,
also to probably provide some ERT tests, and would like to focus on one
issue I came across. Namely, it seems that your work-around:
;; Hack attack! For advices installed before calling
;; Snarf-documentation, the integer offset into the DOC file will not
;; be installed in the "core unadvised function" but in the advice
;; object instead! So here we try to undo the damage.
(when (integerp (aref flist 4))
(setq docfun flist))
is no longer efficient. When I modify uniquifiy.el as follows in emacs
master:
diff --git a/lisp/uniquify.el b/lisp/uniquify.el
index 2ad2fb0eeac..e43d61a3be6 100644
--- a/lisp/uniquify.el
+++ b/lisp/uniquify.el
@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ uniquify-kill-buffer-function
;; rename-buffer and create-file-buffer. (Setting find-file-hook isn't
;; sufficient.)
-;; (advice-add 'rename-buffer :around #'uniquify--rename-buffer-advice)
+(advice-add 'rename-buffer :before #'ignore)
(defun uniquify--rename-buffer-advice (newname &optional unique)
;; BEWARE: This is called directly from `buffer.c'!
"Uniquify buffer names with parts of directory name."
and remake emacs, I do not get the doc string for `rename-buffer' in
that Emacs. Furthermore, if I execute
(Snarf-documentation "DOC")
I get a message
Docstring slot busy for rename-buffer
which makes me think that function store_function_docstring now knows
better than simply overwriting the COMPILED_DOC_STRING slot. Most
likely because of this test:
/* Don't overwrite a non-docstring value placed there,
* such as the symbols used for Oclosures. */
&& VALID_DOCSTRING_P (AREF (fun, COMPILED_DOC_STRING))
What do you think? Strictly speaking, this is not even a bug since
Emacs does not seem to use pre-dump advices.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-18 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-16 12:57 bug#66032: [PATCH] Inline advice documentation into advised function's docstring, after all Jens Schmidt via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-09-16 15:13 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-09-16 17:15 ` Jens Schmidt via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-09-17 20:13 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-09-18 21:03 ` Jens Schmidt via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors [this message]
2023-09-18 22:19 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-09-23 8:07 ` Jens Schmidt via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-09-23 16:03 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-09-23 19:09 ` Jens Schmidt via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-09-23 22:29 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h6nr19f3.fsf@sappc2.fritz.box \
--to=bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
--cc=66032@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=drew.adams@oracle.com \
--cc=jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).