From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1334: 23.0.60; bug of bytecomp arithmetic operations Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:18:09 -0500 Message-ID: <87fxltlj0e.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> References: <874p29kioa.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> Reply-To: Chong Yidong , 1334@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1226723429 8765 80.91.229.12 (15 Nov 2008 04:30:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 04:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1334@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: "Shigeru Fukaya" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 15 05:31:29 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L1Coj-00055Y-GI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2008 05:31:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56089 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L1Cna-0001Oo-Vo for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:30:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L1CnV-0001OZ-HL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:30:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L1CnU-0001ON-0g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:30:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41901 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L1CnT-0001OK-NQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:30:11 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:45623) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L1CnT-0005J4-8W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:30:11 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mAF4U8WA026334; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:30:08 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mAF4P4hQ024747; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:25:04 -0800 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Chong Yidong Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 04:25:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1334 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1334-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1334.122672267823441 (code B ref 1334); Sat, 15 Nov 2008 04:25:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1334) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 15 Nov 2008 04:17:58 +0000 Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mAF4Ht8s023435 for <1334@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:17:56 -0800 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EDF0557E195; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:18:09 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Shigeru Fukaya's message of "Sat, 15 Nov 2008 13:04:34 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:30:13 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:22359 Archived-At: "Shigeru Fukaya" writes: >> Could you separate out the byte-optimize-*-functions part of the patch? > > They are mutually affected. So I'll make and send a patch of > byte-opt.el that includes minimal changes to the latest CVS. It is > necessary because the current byte-opt.el still has problems I > pointed. It will take a few days. > > Is it ok? That would be great. Thanks!