From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#3695: 23.0.94; kill-whole-line has no effect Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:37:22 -0400 Message-ID: <87fxdkm6wt.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: Chong Yidong , 3695@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1246222668 17451 80.91.229.12 (28 Jun 2009 20:57:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:57:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 3695@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Teemu Likonen To: pent Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 28 22:57:41 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ML1RR-0003qQ-Vb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:57:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54978 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ML1RR-00019W-9n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:57:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ML1RN-00017i-56 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:57:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ML1RI-00011r-Ia for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:57:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59113 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ML1RI-00011g-9s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:57:28 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:53199) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ML1RH-0001N5-OV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:57:28 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n5SKvOsC012071; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:57:25 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n5SKj7Hn009834; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:45:07 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Chong Yidong Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:45:07 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 3695 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 3695-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B3695.12462214538828 (code B ref 3695); Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:45:07 +0000 Original-Received: (at 3695) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 28 Jun 2009 20:37:33 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from pantheon-po34.its.yale.edu (pantheon-po34.its.yale.edu [130.132.50.80]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n5SKbTiA008802 for <3695@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:37:30 -0700 Original-Received: from furry (WHITAKER-THREE-EIGHTY-SEVEN.MIT.EDU [18.56.6.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po34.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n5SKbNeN026194 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:37:23 -0400 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D1223C09B; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:37:22 -0400 (EDT) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:57:32 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:29059 Archived-At: > I think kill-visual-line must behave exactly as kill-line, if the text > line consists of just one visual line. Otherwise it's a regression. The docstring of kill-whole-line does not mention kill-visual-line: If non-nil, `kill-line' with no arg at beg of line kills the whole line. You could argue that this can be extended to kill-visual-line, as follows: `kill-visual-line' with no arg at beg of visual line kills the whole visual line. but that doesn't make much sense, because kill-visual-line *already* consumes the entire visual line. In the normal case, kill-line consumes the additional newline character at the end of the line, but word-wrapped lines have no additional newline character to consume.