From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ryan Yeske Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5135: [gnu.org #565169] Deniz Dogan EMACS Assignment Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 09:01:44 -0700 Message-ID: <87fx1485qv.fsf@gmail.com> References: <876321udur.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87mxvcdv1b.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275582492 12142 80.91.229.12 (3 Jun 2010 16:28:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 16:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 5135@debbugs.gnu.org, Chong Yidong To: Deniz Dogan Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 03 18:28:10 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKDH6-0006IY-Lx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 18:28:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42538 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OKDH3-0005Gs-Mg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 12:28:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56316 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OKDGw-0005F3-Ne for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 12:28:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKDGu-0002c1-1k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 12:27:58 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43233) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKDGt-0002bu-VJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 12:27:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKCvi-0008H6-LW; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 12:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ryan Yeske Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 5135 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 5135-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5135.127558111431791 (code B ref 5135); Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5135) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2010 16:05:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKCuu-0008Ge-W4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 12:05:13 -0400 Original-Received: from shawmail.shawcable.com ([64.59.128.220] helo=mail.shawcable.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKCrc-0008ET-Ra for 5135@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 12:01:49 -0400 Original-Received: from bpd2mi4no-svcs.prod.shawcable.com ([10.0.184.123]) by bpd2mo1no-ssvc.prod.shawcable.com with ESMTP; 03 Jun 2010 10:01:43 -0600 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.0 c=1 a=_Z3MJ9EbrP0A:10 a=GQCbJdZ--msA:10 a=VphdPIyG4kEA:10 a=8upR_K80XksA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=bMvYJhr/Jvw5P58HeWDmNg==:17 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=JRFtJGBJAAAA:8 a=vgmhjZsKSbas20TUkZAA:9 a=dzVSGHf6LQ2nV2TDa_PguwHpFc4A:4 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=dAUg0o1D4TkA:10 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,355,1272866400"; d="scan'208";a="222802963" Original-Received: from unknown (HELO bpd2mi4no-cmts.prod.shawcable.com) ([192.168.183.123]) by bpd2mi4no-cmts.prod.shawcable.com with ESMTP; 03 Jun 2010 10:01:43 -0600 X-reinject: true Original-Received: from unknown (HELO rhizome) ([70.77.213.102]) by bpd2mi4no-dmz.prod.shawcable.com with ESMTP; 03 Jun 2010 10:01:42 -0600 Original-Received: from rcy by rhizome with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OKCrY-0001qi-68; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 09:01:44 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Deniz Dogan's message of "Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:53:43 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 12:05:07 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 12:06:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:37509 Archived-At: Deniz Dogan writes: > 2010/6/3 Chong Yidong : >> If most IRC clients sort nicknames this way, it may not be necessary to >> create a new option `rcirc-sort-nicknames'. =C2=A0We should just perform= the >> sorting automatically. =C2=A0What do you think? =C2=A0(I don't know enou= gh about >> "typical" IRC behavior to say). >> > > I'm all for making this option the default - I see no reason why > people would not want to sort the nicknames. Pretty much every IRC > client used today sorts the nicknames like this. I just figured maybe > some people get annoyed by the (almost infinitely small) overhead it > takes to perform the actual sorting. rcirc users like to keep it > minimalistic I have found. I have no issue with the overhead if it is truly minimal. I never saw any reason to sort the list of nicks. They are sorted in "server order" which I think shows how long everyone has been in the channel relative to eachother. I like to keep the number of configurable options down to a minimum, so I'm happy to make this sorting the default, and remove `rcirc-sort-nicknames'. Ryan