From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Sieger Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7728: 24.0.50; GDB backtrace from abort Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:46:48 -0500 Message-ID: <87fwsvjgzb.fsf@gmail.com> References: <30041A5C411E45A7B7AF7A9ECA3AA0BE@us.oracle.com> <83y67echvm.fsf@gnu.org> <837heopknq.fsf@gnu.org> <4D2D5E29.3010502@gmx.at> <26B139ADC64E4827BE54938B3CF26872@us.oracle.com> <87k4i7jlux.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1295042094 25481 80.91.229.12 (14 Jan 2011 21:54:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:54:54 +0000 (UTC) To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 14 22:54:50 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PdrbY-0002Ee-0i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:54:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42598 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PdrbN-0004k6-Qg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:54:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60553 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PdrbH-0004hI-1n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:54:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PdrbD-00062r-1c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:54:24 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49308) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PdrbC-00062n-VE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:54:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PdrNM-0004t6-08; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:40:04 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <30041A5C411E45A7B7AF7A9ECA3AA0BE@us.oracle.com> Resent-From: Sean Sieger Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:40:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7728 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.129504116718738 (code B ref -1); Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:40:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jan 2011 21:39:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PdrMj-0004sB-V8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:39:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PdrMg-0004rx-3f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:39:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PdrU1-0004bw-T3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:46:58 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:40191) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PdrU1-0004bs-Qq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:46:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59473 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PdrU0-00063i-NV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:46:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PdrTy-0004av-Co for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:46:56 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:54931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PdrTy-0004aT-2o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:46:54 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PdrTv-00050v-D5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:46:51 +0100 Original-Received: from pool-70-19-90-49.ny325.east.verizon.net ([70.19.90.49]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:46:51 +0100 Original-Received: from sean.sieger by pool-70-19-90-49.ny325.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:46:51 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 36 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-70-19-90-49.ny325.east.verizon.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:C1XNT4KbwvoXlv6ehUUnlVf0es0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:40:04 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43370 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > It could also be that this is the > first time you are running a binary that was built with > ENABLE_CHECKING defined: without that, the abort won't > happen at all. > > For what it's worth, I've been configuring the binaries found in > http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows since the end of July. So say, > since emacs-20100802. Hope this helps; I've only been able to follow > what you are writing in passing. In case it helps I just checked, using a build I have from 2010-07-19 and another from 2010-08-02. The former does not crash; the latter does. So if the difference between those two is ENABLE_CHECKING then this would lend support to Eli's hypothesis wrt ENABLE_CHECKING. These are those builds: In GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2010-07-19 on 3249CTO Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.4) --no-opt --cflags -Ic:/xpm/include' In GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2010-08-02 on 3249CTO Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.4) --no-opt --cflags -Ic:/xpm/include' Right. And thanks for overlooking the lacuna, `--enable-checking'.