From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jidanni@jidanni.org Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6954: bug#8615: Please make sure v q removes the buffer for JPGs just like it does for other files Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 10:27:48 +0800 Message-ID: <87fwm57iaj.fsf@jidanni.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310869710 10365 80.91.229.12 (17 Jul 2011 02:28:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 02:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, 8615@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, 6954@debbugs.gnu.org To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 17 04:28:26 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QiH5l-0006f1-Da for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 04:28:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40832 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QiH5k-0007Dz-EA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 22:28:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52152) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QiH5R-0007DU-I4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 22:28:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QiH5Q-0001Ag-DD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 22:28:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36649) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QiH5P-0001Ab-Vx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 22:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QiH5P-0002nF-3P; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 22:28:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87eidfar8r.fsf@jidanni.org> Resent-From: jidanni@jidanni.org Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 02:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6954 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6954-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6954.131086968010723 (code B ref 6954); Sun, 17 Jul 2011 02:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6954) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jul 2011 02:28:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QiH5K-0002mt-Qr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 22:27:59 -0400 Original-Received: from caiajhbdcbef.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.145] helo=homiemail-a4.g.dreamhost.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QiH5I-0002md-NX; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 22:27:57 -0400 Original-Received: from homiemail-a4.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a4.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B5351C063; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 19:27:50 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:cc:subject :references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s= jidanni.org; b=F6dOQT6RzL8D5PdTurLz6ebCSPrZCsGJkTQZT+loJfkvbOUvn a2QOA3vqrgNoRLwiL1eZ8V9ZIyNjd7cGYAIsmNveJIw0JLKeX492LHFEx1dhv89a WQ/wkHybE8uaWHKohPci44iPRvH0ZN5mmzZeOU2fWcSiwLj7B2KOqDlKaw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=jidanni.org; bh=WozPl+wG2K9+LyU1q29bfWNSzJc=; b=AXkKKgRb/S+vI FRtXFRQOk/7c9HL54VcLeJBAXoLub0OKaOUxWVL2hJYOhtad3OUD9RB/3OWhRmxF FkwZftUiiJXpHnqsdbaqEWr4bU9JBKLP8o/f1EBtuGXvLgtgKxcNNQ5iXvWZyeqt 2rlbIdJSHtk0ONisZm1LiiZcHGMYUw= Original-Received: from jidanni.org (218-163-1-89.dynamic.hinet.net [218.163.1.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by homiemail-a4.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F62F51C062; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 19:27:50 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 22:28:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:49314 Archived-At: >>>>> "SM" == Stefan Monnier writes: >>> C-u q does. And in any case, I was just describing the usual binding >>> used in special-modes, regardless of whether it behaves like view-mode. >>> FWIW, I find view-mode's behavior generally odd and hard to predict (as >>> a user), so I don't think it's crucial to always follow its lead. >> No, but it would be nice if `v' in dired always did the same thing >> with `q'. SM> Why? Because when we hit q on a text file, it neatly disappears (from the buffer list), whereas hitting q on an image file oddly leaves it sitting on the buffer list, one look at which would shock one off ones chair -- my god how did I stuff emacs memory with all those images?