From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10056: 24.0.91; `copy-to-register' does not deactivate the mark Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:42:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87fw6o1uze.fsf@altern.org> References: <87aa7qm1gv.fsf@gnu.org> <87boizuq60.fsf@gnu.org> <20120801211745.GA4203@acm.acm> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347374623 6279 80.91.229.3 (11 Sep 2012 14:43:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:43:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , 10056@debbugs.gnu.org, Chong Yidong To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 11 16:43:46 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TBRgj-0005hh-6i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:43:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37029 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBRgf-0002ab-P2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:43:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBRgX-0002aC-Fj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:43:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBRgP-0000Lu-PP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:43:29 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45261) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBRgP-0000Lq-Kz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:43:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBRh4-00073A-2x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Bastien Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10056 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10056-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10056.134737460927050 (code B ref 10056); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10056) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2012 14:43:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54807 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBRgW-00072E-E7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:43:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com ([74.125.82.172]:61528) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBRgU-000727-JH for 10056@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:43:27 -0400 Original-Received: by weyu54 with SMTP id u54so348370wey.3 for <10056@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 07:42:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=2xPWPkVPHJpSZRmiXOnq7nplpoa6cVAAG7mjMG2z0wM=; b=kYWFBp5YDKaNtSL5ZELdqlkgD6mP4uklDsclYIgkR8RVZKP3E2IRbhS+w8+h+AKYM1 6UPWbcJyvOBRcFlyFvfLKvOMkA6RQIOyU9VJ9Nlnr0jnGxMiDcPr1TBYwWnRoaCRfMmm PF+hktJzHlKX3vBuL7qZW0p9UR2zmfO0O524+Zn3NVS+2fIuJnOI9pNDVLzyqpAKdbau tJ0xvPB0Akq72EtkiqzqFxDAK6cNBidlfgSOCrYL2HULkbegXxHdSh8dXoPIBlOtAcHg GsJXPJ3+4/NHJhh5X6EeW0ASKq4IUDjttjVp7gB9iNaNtrT0UN+ufy3J3OB74EAX6zIZ y3fg== Original-Received: by 10.216.135.148 with SMTP id u20mr9789471wei.137.1347374565165; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 07:42:45 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from myhost.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r9sm4393145wia.2.2012.09.11.07.42.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 07:42:44 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by myhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5BD9789A2; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:42:46 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Sun, 9 Sep 2012 22:20:12 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:64115 Archived-At: Dani Moncayo writes: >> The way mark deactivation works is that the mark gets deactivated after >> any command that modified the buffer (that's the basic heuristic used >> to avoid having to change umpteen commands to explicitly deactivate-mark). > > I think that the general principle for deactivating the mark is not > (and should not be) "after any command that modified the buffer", but > "after any command that _used_ the active region (for any purpose)". ... unless it's immediately useful to reuse the active region? But FWIW I agree in general. -- Bastien