From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22729: 25.0.50; cl-union ignores :test when lists are equal Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:03:24 +1100 Message-ID: <87fuwiq5r7.fsf@gnus.org> References: <86oabf67qu.fsf@ulb.ac.be> <87oab83xk9.fsf@gnus.org> <864mczl4mk.fsf@members.fsf.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456275930 15971 80.91.229.3 (24 Feb 2016 01:05:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 01:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22729@debbugs.gnu.org To: Nicolas Richard Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 24 02:05:15 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aYNtC-0000gS-Pf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 02:05:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60860 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYNt9-00029j-0w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:05:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50395) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYNt4-00027a-IK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:05:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYNt0-0007se-G0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:05:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44705) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYNt0-0007sa-DR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYNt0-0002or-4d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:05:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 01:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22729 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed patch Original-Received: via spool by 22729-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22729.145627584210754 (code B ref 22729); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 01:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22729) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2016 01:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41832 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYNry-0002n7-MF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:04:02 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:38959) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYNrt-0002mt-5g for 22729@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:03:56 -0500 Original-Received: from cpe-60-225-211-161.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([60.225.211.161] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aYNrT-0003FB-VU; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 02:03:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: <864mczl4mk.fsf@members.fsf.org> (Nicolas Richard's message of "Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:43 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aYNrT-0003FB-VU MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1456880609.03197@xdERHlEjrrfjs7Edy8+Gug X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113622 Archived-At: Nicolas Richard writes: > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> And that's because the two "foo" strings are eql here. Apparently the >> Emacs reader is being clever... > > I'm surprised because it didn't fail for me. > > As a test, this: > emacs --batch -Q --eval '(let ((str1 "foo") (str2 "foo")) (message > "%S" (eql str1 str2)))' > returns nil for me. I was surprised, too, but in the ert test the two strings were definitely eql. Perhaps ert byte-compiles the functions, and the byte compiler is doing the clever string thing? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no