From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2291: 23.0.90; finder-commentary Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 19:58:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87fuu7exwq.fsf@gnus.org> References: <004e01c98c77$a84e2420$c2b22382@us.oracle.com> <87wpnjeyms.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461779962 20853 80.91.229.3 (27 Apr 2016 17:59:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2291@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 27 19:59:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1avTjx-0006xe-Ut for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 19:59:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44558 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avTjx-0003FG-Dg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 13:59:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45623) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avTjt-0003An-Fg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 13:59:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avTjq-00077O-AM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 13:59:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38135) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avTjq-00077K-77 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 13:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avTjq-0007Ep-24 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 13:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 2291 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2291-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B2291.146177993027782 (code B ref 2291); Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2291) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2016 17:58:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50468 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avTjd-0007E2-Nj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 13:58:49 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:47196) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avTjc-0007Dv-Go for 2291@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 13:58:48 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avTjZ-0000oi-P5; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 19:58:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:53:30 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:116942 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: >> > 2. The Commentary buffer name should not be "*Finder-package*". That >> > prohibits you from having more than one such buffer. Also, the name >> > should reflect the content: this is the Commentary section of a >> > particular Lisp file. Please use something like this: >> > >> > (pop-to-buffer >> > (concat "*Commentary, " (file-name-sans-extension file) "*")) >> > >> > instead of this: >> > (pop-to-buffer "*Finder-package*") >> > >> > The result will then be a name like this: *Commentary, buff-menu* >> >> Wouldn't it make more sense just to use the *Help* buffer? It has a >> nice history and stuff... > > No, certainly not. It should be commentary-specific, and file-specific, > as described in the bug report. It would be unusual. Most of these help-ish commands reuse the same buffer, and if you want to keep several of them around, you just rename the buffer yourself. So I don't think there's anything more to be done on this report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no