From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25666: Screen rendering bug Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:15:06 -0500 Message-ID: <87fujjl49x.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <83poir3xtt.fsf@gnu.org> <87inofl7x0.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83d1en2w6b.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1486919719 21401 195.159.176.226 (12 Feb 2017 17:15:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 17:15:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: 25666@debbugs.gnu.org, fredde1994@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 12 18:15:15 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ccxjy-000537-OX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 18:15:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52829 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccxk4-000366-B4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:15:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33575) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccxjt-000338-MG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:15:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccxjq-0006BM-I2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:15:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39029) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccxjq-0006BA-ET for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:15:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ccxjq-0001m3-6h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:15:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 17:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25666 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 25666-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25666.14869196446740 (code B ref 25666); Sun, 12 Feb 2017 17:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25666) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2017 17:14:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37228 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ccxiu-0001ke-2W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:14:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f68.google.com ([209.85.214.68]:33823) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ccxis-0001k3-DX for 25666@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:14:02 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f68.google.com with SMTP id o185so9007046itb.1 for <25666@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 09:14:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=4Bo0KV8BNUFP0RB3iQ4Ev95X4fqS4IYgTWJk1ti02v8=; b=HeRwW2g1fa1zHGSPtm7WiqBvmsKT8dhP5ZB/8zPMawyT/mIcW1GQq+P19ykhSRQFTP xR1i8K8hFJYUZAgmfi48KH4EzsnzNmWZW7xmN+7tghp4BvqybamzHzbCF0J+E4RYHw5O tcKyEHEUzjfktDzlzr+QsiSPPTUYfRN7ib6fULTnAFjBL+/g9j5wiQxZjjXkIFUjeCth JIpV5aTexzPmkgWo6sPTbsAvQtfuqbIHbyUu3j69ag3I0zUCIW5CMV+0+ECilGY2wnZ7 e6U3wyB+PB8J7tovhKjvgzOezo4cxaXEOkHlOvFDMPREq0hks01O2I8rTdU/Ko4iF2oH vi1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=4Bo0KV8BNUFP0RB3iQ4Ev95X4fqS4IYgTWJk1ti02v8=; b=dkv12P/cZxZRNLq2+Q5dG2LiH+6U4UZWOGP8w3lJakR3b/lIUCYV4KlAOedtbYtp3a 6VEQaOJfIclJPaTIZ5RB+XMT5fj//fDq46D7Qomv1CHADOJd29eoLBU/c+kqUf+l/5wk f2tH4d2RvYOKt+d90xoJu4DmGeEyg+Z8VINmdl2V172aGHtVv2sO3H3o57gGwKMqhx6b FFdr18wUXZmPRLDSMfday/NZVf1IoZkodVEk7i2i6k7Gcuod7WZgEWhye8fwnIQTMcvT vv+Q99dW5oJ04K2HwFl0zN4YgSo/GokmyU6pQwTZNY0kH47f/sZE6IYOfK+TUHtCeLlC xEXA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nRyQN3UOKi9JVShAuev4yoCB+Hftp/RE98EVX1u0r1h+RYUsPLcCjLboX380ptFA== X-Received: by 10.107.19.9 with SMTP id b9mr19206309ioj.48.1486919636681; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 09:13:56 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d5sm1043834itd.3.2017.02.12.09.13.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 12 Feb 2017 09:13:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83d1en2w6b.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 12 Feb 2017 18:47:24 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:129267 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I see the same here. The frame dimensions are not relevant, btw: I > can see this with any dimensions I tried. Hmm, like the OP, I can't reproduce with an 80x24 terminal. >> It doesn't happen with nlinum-mode, probably because with nlinum-mode >> when the left window scrolls, the margin in the right window is widened >> too. > > I see this with nlinum-mode as well. My terminal is PuTTY (which > emulates xterm). Ah, this depends on how high the terminal is. With an 80x32 terminal I see it with nlinum-mode as well. I think it's just a question of whether the first scroll reaches high enough line numbers to trigger a margin width adjustment. > You can also trigger a slightly different messup by "M-<" after the > first scroll (which by itself looks OK). Yes, in this case the top half of the other window gets lost.