From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27940: Recursively delete dir34? (yes, no, all, quit) Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 19:43:22 +0900 Message-ID: <87fuaj2x11.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87o9rwxmfz.fsf@jidanni.org> <87r2wrkacy.fsf@calancha-pc> <83a83fybrc.fsf@gnu.org> <87vam365q2.fsf@calancha-pc> <834ltnxzyz.fsf@gnu.org> <871sorz9kg.fsf@calancha-pc> <83tw1nwfhp.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2wppabm.fsf@calancha-pc> <87k22e9obk.fsf@ctlt579.codethink.co.uk> <87shek8pi4.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87k1zv3bzw.fsf@gmail.com> <87tvyzgz1e.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1508150673 12635 195.159.176.226 (16 Oct 2017 10:44:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:44:33 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 27940@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 16 12:44:28 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e42sd-0001v7-DM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 12:44:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60378 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e42sa-00010U-Ok for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 06:44:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40365) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e42sQ-0000zD-3U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 06:44:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e42sM-0006Gq-SO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 06:44:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33869) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e42sM-0006Gk-OT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 06:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e42sM-00041V-Az for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 06:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tino Calancha Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27940 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 27940-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27940.150815061715420 (code B ref 27940); Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27940) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2017 10:43:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42550 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e42rx-00040e-06 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 06:43:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-f180.google.com ([209.85.192.180]:44555) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e42rv-00040Q-JG for 27940@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 06:43:35 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-f180.google.com with SMTP id x7so15544999pfa.1 for <27940@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 03:43:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=f80mIa+6TjxvVXEoK3+BzYzo6ltea5fNcuKwdSL6cyg=; b=Hg+DayzyikR5gLYpZ/JO5L+PfP2sBzIX7j/IeY1SDKAs6xF9ia2gU80lJf57LuLv73 5H+SFIqwZfc7OnVz+nrZmbPpbI2wHVXHE7w1+ZXrXRCJF7Vfwj9YFukszy2FIe6EFDIt ewZQqSprWQ2ol8+EniwKphXIul1eqYkFOpXzLwDqd2utdRNvOmheDZhJY7h9l6Nmj4U2 SENEzDFUvJGJUMuwdhw5DsPLM7bii+74e66jxgskjDQW2gNewhkvhaX7oAJ7e8uh0c0o tyzOWRjHlRLi5QARjmm6to+bs9LnifB38TUhnVXtG5m5ePpE5MIjXQgsscQ3FkiDEoS8 ZZtg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=f80mIa+6TjxvVXEoK3+BzYzo6ltea5fNcuKwdSL6cyg=; b=Ea/jVgw59VX3YEkra1NF8WkuN0u60ky+qbuMH2C/fuX6A254G9d5hcvmC3gpeXtNF9 negYmaliWxpz2chn4UjEK+K5YmN+IMMwjUqtyOTiU4/Le4JYMdwvNGsQydtFTwdvsuiP FSdJmgbSArHuP3yFvoImu07qTnwYkg9k3QT5gQOPfQxAwUmrFiC6uCzWW1x9kOfdJ1ws Jpq5GRNrsvZ33tUZN/fYEm5sTv0L84xWovaupkDKbdhcd0bVFGPjnyKyCj39tzu4IayO 4zAFVuI5OFuYocNFlKhPWzRVHZMHJ7v5Xv9evvxcSKhhsZL1rxEWoCA7k1J36KKEO9tf iVwA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaWFrrBU1+6rBdlcsqrBlTf/AzkoIyfEbjvq5kmkMMwidyaghmeE AzE2a1/AHaA86siCEsDRuBrxLg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QB3QzdWD0F9HloSQlRkpkNf070KeEG12MDH+4SfqKpVnm+/WXt/Xskcl0jDBGqN8slC+LTnlA== X-Received: by 10.98.163.193 with SMTP id q62mr8416859pfl.276.1508150609547; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 03:43:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from calancha-pc (203.191.218.133.dy.bbexcite.jp. [133.218.191.203]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b1sm11866234pgc.67.2017.10.16.03.43.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 16 Oct 2017 03:43:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87tvyzgz1e.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (Noam Postavsky's message of "Mon, 16 Oct 2017 06:36:13 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:138511 Archived-At: Noam Postavsky writes: > Tino Calancha writes: > >> Those tests implicitely assume you keep the >> 'dired-recursive-deletes' default, i.e. 'top; IMO it's not >> sorprising that they fail if you run them interactively >> with other 'dired-recursive-deletes' value. > > It is failing for me when I run non-interactively: > > make -C test dired-tests > > Does it not fail for you? No, in my case they pass (commit: eed3a3d9e95d2c5346a23c9d92ca4e5848330183): passed 4/11 dired-test-bug27243-01 passed 5/11 dired-test-bug27243-02 passed 6/11 dired-test-bug27243-03 passed 7/11 dired-test-bug27631 passed 8/11 dired-test-bug27899 passed 9/11 dired-test-bug27940 passed 10/11 dired-test-bug27968 passed 11/11 dired-test-bug7131 Ran 11 tests, 11 results as expected (2017-10-16 19:37:34+0900) It pass in the gitlab CI as well: https://gitlab.com/emacs-ci/emacs/-/jobs/36237548 I don't know why it fails for you.