From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33782: 27.0.50; Emacsclient ignores errors when its frame is deleted Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 01:32:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87ftnepyvp.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="247956"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 33782@debbugs.gnu.org To: Philipp Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 10 01:56:39 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hkzyQ-0012Pk-Nf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 01:56:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56950 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkzyP-0007kn-K3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 19:56:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkzca-0004Tz-IX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 19:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hkzcZ-00029y-9q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 19:34:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53947) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hkzcY-00027T-Ni for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 19:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkzcY-0004c1-Bi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 19:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 23:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33782 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 33782-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33782.156271518417608 (code B ref 33782); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 23:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33782) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2019 23:33:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34531 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkzbc-0004Zw-6K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 19:33:04 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:55726) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkzba-0004ZU-Je for 33782@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 19:33:03 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hkzbW-00020V-Qx; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 01:33:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Philipp's message of "Mon, 17 Dec 2018 22:52:00 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:162579 Archived-At: Philipp writes: > Assuming an Emacs server is running: > > $ emacsclient --create-frame --eval '(unwind-protect (error "foo") (delete-frame))' ; echo $? > 0 > > This means that if the frame created by Emacsclient is deleted, errors > are ignored. This seems like a bug; I wouldn't expect errors to be > ignored in this case, because they should bubble up through the > `unwind-protect' form. Well... like (unwind-protect (error "foo") (message "zot")) there's no error bubbling, and there's no error to be returned, so I think this is correct behaviour? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no