From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36837: 26.2; whitespace-mode: whitespace-line-column is not set to local fill-column Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 21:10:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87ftmjcrit.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20190729111756.0665feb6@ventiloplattform.tastytea.de> <87k1bvfwda.fsf@gmail.com> <874l2zvcak.fsf@igel.home> <87ftmjfvpw.fsf@gmail.com> <83a7crfvbm.fsf@gnu.org> <877e7vfuu6.fsf@gmail.com> <838ssbfliw.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="65789"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Notmuch/0.29.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/27.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: tastytea@tastytea.de, schwab@linux-m68k.org, 36837@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 02 21:11:33 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1htcxg-000Gzf-Cu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 21:11:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37078 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htcxf-00081P-E1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:11:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44024) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htcxR-00080P-8a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:11:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1htcxH-0001UW-Kz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:11:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48907) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1htcxC-0001N5-MC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:11:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htcxC-0007H6-FD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 19:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36837 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36837-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36837.156477304527938 (code B ref 36837); Fri, 02 Aug 2019 19:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36837) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2019 19:10:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57728 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htcwu-0007GY-JL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:10:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:40268) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htcws-0007GI-9q for 36837@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:10:42 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id r1so78189017wrl.7 for <36837@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 12:10:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MNi9mzXBoaIPXLuQJOI7MxaJemQOxxBNuNzn85/f3uY=; b=mT069qDsvQmphlL/D3wM23vnQHYCUVy9u6LNxbz1Y66nj9wL27k0C22XbYk316wsPU TQEAkMQe56xjK9hIxAp4IDcOThMMLMRU4ZGtMfAW333zwHkbJJHUaQtgY8pbmN4fRysw GWMGOr+m0ZHnZWL6vjAPxqNmat0NgDNDk+M7l4Yec6HzbWGPS4XIm0WlX4hMooAxeWa3 afNY1il+trthc6LA3Cz85mBJvKzYAf33X6bcm8SCdWwjVwyklSpbM6KS6t3l9+FTqyY9 LwfgHOz5NbtgVGD0aeoAgfuN6v1/DJkEplHTbQJNBegZBz5FCrXfmfFsLrBY5K5OsRyL sHpw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MNi9mzXBoaIPXLuQJOI7MxaJemQOxxBNuNzn85/f3uY=; b=phsv/qitkm3Dvm58hJsBOEe8XG1njBv5CggoVkwLiwKlvhLJqjtDVcns9RuhkFzHAx +gJ6W3g22BVFEwEpO5mlnbzMcrRUoTu1ahyk3UgNdRfgr81jtE/G30lolRMNg36J3EgZ 0GbU0sOs3kdpj/+zML2L0q5l/eawNWpFWQuREBprtWHaLBSFEMf74WhGy/Vp6/pasirl v279KaB9k+NACi8iB+fDVmhZ/LmLz0eiFkJLYRphcMfTXiAYKEp9BHO9S/9+L3R3e/cW e20QH2lAYeM0qrHi5R6VJN4C9ML+CI3BXRN7aBPOQAorwV3e+TVhNzIeg4sCWiDY7fG4 z6og== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUKjlaeXaRu8BM61Ezxa4Et7N9r6a2SMSlYsjGknq6js+5mhjN8 93diw1cHmz4AxT4lhycIh/E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyAnwg8WJNxd7SFiSFcb/r9eDO86e3MhpAsqtoVVV5pJmg9fmwEQJaxcXHjPQf56yw40LvuIg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e8cb:: with SMTP id k11mr63494764wrn.244.1564773036506; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 12:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([185.112.167.114]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n8sm63707674wro.89.2019.08.02.12.10.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 02 Aug 2019 12:10:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <838ssbfliw.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:164381 Archived-At: On Fri, 02 Aug 2019 21:51:51 +0300 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Maybe I'm being thick, but have you (and Andreas) actually read what >> I wrote? > > Do you realize how rude this kind of question sounds? If I did I definitely wouldn't have posed it that way and I'm sorry if that upset you. I simply stated what I (still) mean: it seems to me that your and Andreas's response did not address what I wrote, and I can only think of two possible explanations: either you actually really did and somehow I don't realize it (i.e., I'm stupid, thick or however one might call it, or simply misunderstanding), or you must be misunderstanding what I wrote. >> I.e., instead of restating the obvious (mode hooks are more general >> and should be overridden by file-local variables; no disagreement >> there), could you provide some concrete counter-arguments to my >> arguments? > > We just did, both of us. OK. I don't see it that way or just don't get it, I'm sorry. No need to assume ill will or offense, I have no idea why I should want to waste our time that (or any other) way. --=20 =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n