From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27997: pick a better buffer to fill the gap, not one I already see Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 22:03:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87ftjvw0vc.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87y3qwkybj.fsf@jidanni.org> <87tw1knijc.fsf@calancha-pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="133281"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 27997@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson To: Tino Calancha Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 14 22:05:06 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iK6aX-000YWf-BQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 22:05:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57152 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iK6aW-000610-3h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:05:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48328) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iK6ZX-0005j5-Ek for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:04:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iK6ZV-0001ZF-Vv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:04:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:32975) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iK6ZV-0001Z9-R0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:04:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iK6ZV-0001QY-Kf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:04:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 20:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27997 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 27997-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27997.15710834255449 (code B ref 27997); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 20:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27997) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Oct 2019 20:03:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41793 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iK6ZD-0001Ph-5N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:03:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.231.51] (port=38878 helo=quimby.gnus.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iK6ZA-0001PW-SS for 27997@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:03:41 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iK6Z6-0003Wq-9w; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 22:03:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87tw1knijc.fsf@calancha-pc> (Tino Calancha's message of "Mon, 07 Aug 2017 12:49:59 +0900") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169301 Archived-At: Tino Calancha writes: >> So please when selecting a buffer to fill the gap, >> again be smart enough not to show a buffer I already see. > The original code pick up the previous buffer shown in that same > window. That's a feature; sometimes might be desirable. So this works as designed, and I'm closing this as a "wontfix". -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no