From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39185: [PATCH] Don't include section "Recent messages" in bug reports Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 17:07:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87ftgbjuqa.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87y2u4uxk5.fsf@marxist.se> <7c4de596-6e2e-48e9-a187-e16a36c59176@default> <87k15ouq36.fsf@marxist.se> <83blqzzdgn.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv4rtqj2.fsf@marxist.se> <83zhejxx80.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="114250"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 39185@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Kangas To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 19 17:08:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1itD7T-000ThN-5K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 17:08:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51198 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1itD7R-00022b-Qd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 11:08:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47828) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1itD7L-00022T-0K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 11:08:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1itD7J-0001ax-T6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 11:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37798) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1itD7J-0001as-Q1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 11:08:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1itD7J-0001Gw-KW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 11:08:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 16:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39185 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 39185-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39185.15794500414837 (code B ref 39185); Sun, 19 Jan 2020 16:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39185) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jan 2020 16:07:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43771 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1itD6f-0001Fx-7l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 11:07:21 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:44480) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1itD6d-0001Fl-I6 for 39185@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 11:07:20 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1itD6T-0004Zm-QU; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 17:07:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83zhejxx80.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 19 Jan 2020 17:49:35 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:174873 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I'm not sure I understand what is the general case here. Each part of > the report that could potentially disclose private information shall > be identified and dealt with. There's little in the *Messages* buffer that isn't potentially private. For instance, here's the last two lines of mine: nnimap quimby.gnus.org splitting mail...done nnimap read 6k from quimby.gnus.org That could be private information. It rather sounds like you're asking us to get rid of the *Messages* buffer altogether. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no